cat_logo
HomeAudi

100

Audi 100 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Audi 100

Audi 100 1991

1990 100 Avant (4A,C4)

Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

    • Average size for generation: 2.35 L (2346 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1984 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2.8 L (2771 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 469 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6 L smaller (-6036 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.92 L bigger (+1922 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 93 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1991 Audi 100

  • 2.0 16V —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.6 V6 —2598 cc (2598 L)
  • 2.8 V6 E —2771 cc (2771 L)
  • 2.8 E —2771 cc (2771 L)
  • 2.3 E —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 2.5 TDI —2461 cc (2461 L)
  • 2.0 E —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.2 S4 Turbo —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.0 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.4 D —2370 cc (2370 L)

    1991 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 16V —14.5 cc/hp (19.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.6 V6 —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.8 V6 E —15.9 cc/hp (21.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.8 E —15.9 cc/hp (21.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 E —17.4 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 TDI —21.4 cc/hp (29 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E —17.3 cc/hp (23.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 S4 Turbo —9.7 cc/hp (13.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —19.6 cc/hp (26.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.4 D —28.9 cc/hp (39.5 cc/kW)

    1991 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 16V —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.6 V6 —10.74 or 252 cc bigger
  • 2.8 V6 E —18.12 or 425 cc bigger
  • 2.8 E —18.12 or 425 cc bigger
  • 2.3 E —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 2.5 TDI —4.9 or 115 cc bigger
  • 2.0 E —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.2 S4 Turbo —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.4 D —1.02 or 24 cc bigger

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 16V 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 69 hp from 1 L 142 cc to 100 kg
    2.6 V6 2.6 L
    (2598 cc)     		10.7% bigger 137 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 162 cc to 100 kg
    2.8 V6 E 2.77 L
    (2771 cc)     		18.1% bigger 115 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 173 cc to 100 kg
    2.8 E 2.77 L
    (2771 cc)     		18.1% bigger 107 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 185 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 E 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 96 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 TDI 2.46 L
    (2461 cc)     		4.9% bigger 70 cc to 1 mpg 47 hp from 1 L 164 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 132 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 S4 Turbo 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 93 cc to 1 mpg 103 hp from 1 L 131 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 68 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 142 cc to 100 kg
    2.4 D 2.37 L
    (2370 cc)     		1% bigger 76 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 169 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 142 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.6 V6
    Precise engine size 2.6 L (2598 cc)
    Difference from world average 10.7 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 137 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 162 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.8 V6 E
    Precise engine size 2.77 L (2771 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 115 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 173 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.8 E
    Precise engine size 2.77 L (2771 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 107 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 185 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 96 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 TDI
    Precise engine size 2.46 L (2461 cc)
    Difference from world average 4.9 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 70 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 164 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 132 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 S4 Turbo
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 93 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 103 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 131 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 68 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 142 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Precise engine size 2.37 L (2370 cc)
    Difference from world average 1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 76 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 169 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1990

    1990 100 (4A,C4)

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.31 L (2308 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1984 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.8 L (2771 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.04 L smaller (-38 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 462 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.1 L smaller (-6074 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.88 L bigger (+1884 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 87 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1990 Audi 100

  • 2.8 V6 E —2771 cc (2771 L)
  • 2.6 V6 —2598 cc (2598 L)
  • 2.5 TDI —2461 cc (2461 L)
  • 2.3 E —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 2.0 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.0 E —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.0 E 16V —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.4 D —2370 cc (2370 L)

    1990 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.8 V6 E —15.9 cc/hp (21.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.6 V6 —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 TDI —21.4 cc/hp (29 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 E —17.4 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —19.6 cc/hp (26.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E —17.3 cc/hp (23.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E 16V —14.5 cc/hp (19.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.4 D —28.9 cc/hp (39.5 cc/kW)

    1990 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.8 V6 E —18.12 or 425 cc bigger
  • 2.6 V6 —10.74 or 252 cc bigger
  • 2.5 TDI —4.9 or 115 cc bigger
  • 2.3 E —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E 16V —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.4 D —1.02 or 24 cc bigger

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.8 V6 E 2.77 L
    (2771 cc)     		18.1% bigger 103 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    2.6 V6 2.6 L
    (2598 cc)     		10.7% bigger 96 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 186 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 TDI 2.46 L
    (2461 cc)     		4.9% bigger 63 cc to 1 mpg 47 hp from 1 L 176 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 E 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 96 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 142 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E 16V 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 79 cc to 1 mpg 69 hp from 1 L 142 cc to 100 kg
    2.4 D 2.37 L
    (2370 cc)     		1% bigger 72 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 169 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.8 V6 E
    Precise engine size 2.77 L (2771 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 103 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.6 V6
    Precise engine size 2.6 L (2598 cc)
    Difference from world average 10.7 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 96 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 186 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 TDI
    Precise engine size 2.46 L (2461 cc)
    Difference from world average 4.9 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 63 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 176 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 96 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 142 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E 16V
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 79 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 142 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Precise engine size 2.37 L (2370 cc)
    Difference from world average 1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 72 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 169 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1989

    1988 100 Avant (C3, Typ 44, 44Q, facelift 1988)

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.14 L (2138 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1781 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2461 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.21 L smaller (-208 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 19 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 428 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.2 L smaller (-6244 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.71 L bigger (+1714 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 86 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1989 Audi 100

  • 2.3 CAT —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 2.0 TD —1986 cc (1986 L)
  • 2.0 E CAT —1994 cc (1994 L)
  • 2.0 D —1986 cc (1986 L)
  • 2.3 —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 1.8 —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • 1.8 CAT —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • 2.2 CAT —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.2 —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.4 D —2370 cc (2370 L)
  • 2.5 TDI —2461 cc (2461 L)

    1989 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.3 CAT —17 cc/hp (23.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 TD —19.9 cc/hp (26.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E CAT —17.3 cc/hp (23.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.4 cc/hp (38.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 —17 cc/hp (23.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 CAT —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 CAT —16.1 cc/hp (22 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 —16.1 cc/hp (22 cc/kW)
  • 2.4 D —28.9 cc/hp (39.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 TDI —20.5 cc/hp (28 cc/kW)

    1989 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.3 CAT —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 2.0 TD —15.35 or 360 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E CAT —15 or 352 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —15.35 or 360 cc smaller
  • 2.3 —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • 1.8 CAT —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • 2.2 CAT —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.2 —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.4 D —1.02 or 24 cc bigger
  • 2.5 TDI —4.9 or 115 cc bigger

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.3 CAT 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 105 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 TD 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 50 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E CAT 1.99 L
    (1994 cc)     		15% smaller 83 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 110 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 Turbo CAT 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 106 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 148 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 137 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 CAT 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 137 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 CAT 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 82 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 171 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 93 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    2.4 D 2.37 L
    (2370 cc)     		1% bigger 88 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 182 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 TDI 2.46 L
    (2461 cc)     		4.9% bigger 85 cc to 1 mpg 49 hp from 1 L 176 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 CAT
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 105 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 TD
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E CAT
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1994 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 83 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 110 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo CAT
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 106 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 148 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 137 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 CAT
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 137 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 CAT
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 82 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 171 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 93 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Precise engine size 2.37 L (2370 cc)
    Difference from world average 1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 88 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 182 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 TDI
    Precise engine size 2.46 L (2461 cc)
    Difference from world average 4.9 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 85 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 176 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1988

    1988 100 (C3, Typ 44,44Q, facelift 1988)

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.15 L (2146 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1781 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2461 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.2 L smaller (-200 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 429 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.2 L smaller (-6236 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.72 L bigger (+1722 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 87 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1988 Audi 100

  • 1.8 —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.2 Turbo —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.3 E CAT —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 2.0 D —1986 cc (1986 L)
  • 2.0 D Turbo —1986 cc (1986 L)
  • 2.0 E —1994 cc (1994 L)
  • 1.8 CAT —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • 2.0 E CAT —1994 cc (1994 L)
  • 2.2 E —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.2 CAT —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.3 E —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 2.4 D —2370 cc (2370 L)
  • 2.5 TDI —2461 cc (2461 L)
  • 2.3 —2309 cc (2309 L)

    1988 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.8 —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 Turbo —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 E CAT —17 cc/hp (23.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.4 cc/hp (38.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D Turbo —19.9 cc/hp (26.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E —17.3 cc/hp (23.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 CAT —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E CAT —17.3 cc/hp (23.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 E —16.1 cc/hp (22 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 CAT —16.1 cc/hp (22 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 E —17.4 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.4 D —28.9 cc/hp (39.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 TDI —20.5 cc/hp (28 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 —17 cc/hp (23.1 cc/kW)

    1988 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.8 —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.2 Turbo —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.3 E CAT —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —15.35 or 360 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D Turbo —15.35 or 360 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E —15 or 352 cc smaller
  • 1.8 CAT —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E CAT —15 or 352 cc smaller
  • 2.2 E —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.2 CAT —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.3 E —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 2.4 D —1.02 or 24 cc bigger
  • 2.5 TDI —4.9 or 115 cc bigger
  • 2.3 —1.58 or 37 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.8 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 137 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 Turbo CAT 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 101 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 Turbo 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 93 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 171 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 E CAT 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D Turbo 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 50 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E 1.99 L
    (1994 cc)     		15% smaller 74 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 CAT 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 137 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E CAT 1.99 L
    (1994 cc)     		15% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 E 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 82 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 171 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 CAT 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 93 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 E 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    2.4 D 2.37 L
    (2370 cc)     		1% bigger 72 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 182 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 TDI 2.46 L
    (2461 cc)     		4.9% bigger 63 cc to 1 mpg 49 hp from 1 L 189 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 137 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo CAT
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 101 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 93 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 171 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 E CAT
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D Turbo
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1994 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 74 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 CAT
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 137 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E CAT
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1994 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 E
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 82 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 171 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 CAT
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 93 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Precise engine size 2.37 L (2370 cc)
    Difference from world average 1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 72 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 182 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 TDI
    Precise engine size 2.46 L (2461 cc)
    Difference from world average 4.9 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 63 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 189 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1986

    1982 100 (C3, Typ 44,44Q)

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.12 L (2119 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1781 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2309 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.23 L smaller (-227 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 424 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6263 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.7 L bigger (+1695 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 84 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1986 Audi 100

  • 2.2 E Turbo —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.3 E —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 1.8 —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • 2.0 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 1.9 —1921 cc (1921 L)
  • 2.0 D —1986 cc (1986 L)
  • 2.0 D Turbo —1986 cc (1986 L)
  • 2.1 —2144 cc (2144 L)
  • 2.2 CAT —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.2 E —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.2 —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.2 Turbo —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.3 —2309 cc (2309 L)

    1986 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.2 E Turbo —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 E —17 cc/hp (23.1 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —17.6 cc/hp (23.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 —19.2 cc/hp (26 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.4 cc/hp (38.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D Turbo —22.8 cc/hp (31 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 —15.8 cc/hp (21.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 CAT —19.4 cc/hp (26.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 E —18.6 cc/hp (25.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 —16.1 cc/hp (22 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 Turbo —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 —17 cc/hp (23.1 cc/kW)

    1986 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.2 E Turbo —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.3 E —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 1.9 —18.12 or 425 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —15.35 or 360 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D Turbo —15.35 or 360 cc smaller
  • 2.1 —8.61 or 202 cc smaller
  • 2.2 CAT —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.2 E —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.2 —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.2 Turbo —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.3 —1.58 or 37 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.2 E Turbo 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 101 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 E 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller 61 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 148 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller - 57 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 1.92 L
    (1921 cc)     		18.1% smaller - 52 hp from 1 L 175 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller 58 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D Turbo 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller 60 cc to 1 mpg 44 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 2.14 L
    (2144 cc)     		8.6% smaller - 64 hp from 1 L 179 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 CAT 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 93 cc to 1 mpg 52 hp from 1 L 171 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 E 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 101 cc to 1 mpg 54 hp from 1 L 171 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 171 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 Turbo 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 93 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 171 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 E Turbo
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 101 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 61 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 148 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.92 L (1921 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 175 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 58 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D Turbo
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 60 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 44 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1
    Precise engine size 2.14 L (2144 cc)
    Difference from world average 8.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 64 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 179 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 CAT
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 93 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 171 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 E
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 101 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 54 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 171 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 171 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 93 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 171 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1986

    1982 100 Avant (C3, Typ 44, 44Q)

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.08 L (2079 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1781 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2309 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.27 L smaller (-267 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 416 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6303 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.66 L bigger (+1655 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 85 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1986 Audi 100

  • 1.8 —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • 1.8 CAT —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • 1.9 —1921 cc (1921 L)
  • 2.0 CAT —1994 cc (1994 L)
  • 2.0 D —1986 cc (1986 L)
  • 2.0 E —1994 cc (1994 L)
  • 2.0 TD —1986 cc (1986 L)
  • 2.1 —2144 cc (2144 L)
  • 2.2 —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.2 E —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.2 Turbo —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.3 —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 2.3 E —2309 cc (2309 L)

    1986 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.8 —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 CAT —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 —19.2 cc/hp (26 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 CAT —17.6 cc/hp (24 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.4 cc/hp (38.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E —17.3 cc/hp (23.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 TD —22.8 cc/hp (31 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 —15.8 cc/hp (21.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 —16.1 cc/hp (22 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 E —18.6 cc/hp (25.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 Turbo —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 —17 cc/hp (23.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 E —17 cc/hp (23.1 cc/kW)

    1986 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.8 —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • 1.8 CAT —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • 1.9 —18.12 or 425 cc smaller
  • 2.0 CAT —15 or 352 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —15.35 or 360 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E —15 or 352 cc smaller
  • 2.0 TD —15.35 or 360 cc smaller
  • 2.1 —8.61 or 202 cc smaller
  • 2.2 —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.2 E —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.2 Turbo —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.3 —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 2.3 E —1.58 or 37 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.8 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller 61 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 148 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 CAT 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 148 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 1.92 L
    (1921 cc)     		18.1% smaller 84 cc to 1 mpg 52 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 CAT 1.99 L
    (1994 cc)     		15% smaller 83 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller - 35 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E 1.99 L
    (1994 cc)     		15% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 TD 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller 58 cc to 1 mpg 44 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 2.14 L
    (2144 cc)     		8.6% smaller 97 cc to 1 mpg 64 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 E 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 54 hp from 1 L 202 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 Turbo 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 101 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 148 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 Turbo CAT 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 93 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 202 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 E 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 61 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 148 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 CAT
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 148 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.92 L (1921 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 84 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 CAT
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1994 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 83 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1994 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 TD
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 58 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 44 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1
    Precise engine size 2.14 L (2144 cc)
    Difference from world average 8.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 97 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 64 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 E
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 54 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 202 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 101 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 148 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo CAT
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 93 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 202 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1980

    1979 100 Avant (C2, Typ 43, facelift 1979)

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.91 L (1910 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1588 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.1 L (2144 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.44 L smaller (-436 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 19 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 382 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6472 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.49 L bigger (+1486 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 75 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1980 Audi 100

  • 1.9 —1921 cc (1921 L)
  • 2.1 L —2144 cc (2144 L)
  • 1.6 L —1588 cc (1588 L)
  • 2.0 D —1986 cc (1986 L)

    1980 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.9 —19.2 cc/hp (26 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 L —15.8 cc/hp (21.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 L —18.7 cc/hp (25.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.4 cc/hp (38.9 cc/kW)

    1980 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.9 —18.12 or 425 cc smaller
  • 2.1 L —8.61 or 202 cc smaller
  • 1.6 L —32.31 or 758 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —15.35 or 360 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.9 1.92 L
    (1921 cc)     		18.1% smaller - 52 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 L 2.14 L
    (2144 cc)     		8.6% smaller 97 cc to 1 mpg 64 hp from 1 L 179 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 L 1.59 L
    (1588 cc)     		32.3% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 53 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller 62 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.92 L (1921 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 L
    Precise engine size 2.14 L (2144 cc)
    Difference from world average 8.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 97 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 64 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 179 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 L
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1588 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1980

    1979 100 (C2, Typ 43, facelift 1979)

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.91 L (1910 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1588 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.1 L (2144 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.44 L smaller (-436 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 19 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 382 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6472 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.49 L bigger (+1486 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 75 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1980 Audi 100

  • 2.1 L —2144 cc (2144 L)
  • 1.6 L —1588 cc (1588 L)
  • 2.0 D —1986 cc (1986 L)
  • 1.9 —1921 cc (1921 L)

    1980 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.1 L —15.8 cc/hp (21.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 L —18.7 cc/hp (25.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.4 cc/hp (38.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 —19.2 cc/hp (26 cc/kW)

    1980 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.1 L —8.61 or 202 cc smaller
  • 1.6 L —32.31 or 758 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —15.35 or 360 cc smaller
  • 1.9 —18.12 or 425 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.1 L 2.14 L
    (2144 cc)     		8.6% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 64 hp from 1 L 179 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 L 1.59 L
    (1588 cc)     		32.3% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 53 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller 62 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 1.92 L
    (1921 cc)     		18.1% smaller 74 cc to 1 mpg 52 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 L
    Precise engine size 2.14 L (2144 cc)
    Difference from world average 8.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 64 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 179 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 L
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1588 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.92 L (1921 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 74 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1977

    1976 100 (C2, Typ 43)

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.93 L (1926 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1588 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.1 L (2144 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.42 L smaller (-420 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 385 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6456 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.5 L bigger (+1502 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 74 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1977 Audi 100

  • 1.6 L —1588 cc (1588 L)
  • 2.0 D —1986 cc (1986 L)
  • 2.0 LS —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.1 L —2144 cc (2144 L)

    1977 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 L —18.7 cc/hp (25.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.4 cc/hp (38.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 LS —17.3 cc/hp (23.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 L —18.6 cc/hp (25.2 cc/kW)

    1977 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 L —32.31 or 758 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —15.35 or 360 cc smaller
  • 2.0 LS —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.1 L —8.61 or 202 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 L 1.59 L
    (1588 cc)     		32.3% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 53 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 LS 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 99 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 L 2.14 L
    (2144 cc)     		8.6% smaller 102 cc to 1 mpg 54 hp from 1 L 179 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 L
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1588 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 LS
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 99 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 L
    Precise engine size 2.14 L (2144 cc)
    Difference from world average 8.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 102 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 54 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 179 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1977

    1977 100 Avant (C2, Typ 43)

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.93 L (1926 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1588 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.1 L (2144 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.42 L smaller (-420 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 385 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6456 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.5 L bigger (+1502 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 74 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1977 Audi 100

  • 1.6 L —1588 cc (1588 L)
  • 2.0 D —1986 cc (1986 L)
  • 2.1 L —2144 cc (2144 L)
  • 2.0 LS —1984 cc (1984 L)

    1977 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 L —18.7 cc/hp (25.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.4 cc/hp (38.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 L —18.6 cc/hp (25.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 LS —17.3 cc/hp (23.3 cc/kW)

    1977 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 L —32.31 or 758 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —15.35 or 360 cc smaller
  • 2.1 L —8.61 or 202 cc smaller
  • 2.0 LS —15.43 or 362 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 L 1.59 L
    (1588 cc)     		32.3% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 53 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 1.99 L
    (1986 cc)     		15.3% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 L 2.14 L
    (2144 cc)     		8.6% smaller 102 cc to 1 mpg 54 hp from 1 L 179 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 LS 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 99 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 L
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1588 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1986 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 L
    Precise engine size 2.14 L (2144 cc)
    Difference from world average 8.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 102 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 54 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 179 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 LS
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 99 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1973

    1974 100 (C1, facelift 1973)

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.75 L (1745 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1588 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.9 L (1871 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.6 L smaller (-601 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 349 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6637 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.32 L bigger (+1321 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 81 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1973 Audi 100

  • 1.8 —1761 cc (1761 L)
  • 1.8 LS —1761 cc (1761 L)
  • 1.9 GL —1871 cc (1871 L)
  • 1.6 —1588 cc (1588 L)

    1973 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.8 —20.7 cc/hp (28 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 LS —17.6 cc/hp (23.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 GL —16.7 cc/hp (22.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 —18.7 cc/hp (25.2 cc/kW)

    1973 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.8 —24.94 or 585 cc smaller
  • 1.8 LS —24.94 or 585 cc smaller
  • 1.9 GL —20.25 or 475 cc smaller
  • 1.6 —32.31 or 758 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.8 1.76 L
    (1761 cc)     		24.9% smaller 80 cc to 1 mpg 48 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 LS 1.76 L
    (1761 cc)     		24.9% smaller 80 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 GL 1.87 L
    (1871 cc)     		20.2% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 60 hp from 1 L 170 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 1.59 L
    (1588 cc)     		32.3% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 53 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1761 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 80 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 48 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 LS
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1761 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 80 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 GL
    Precise engine size 1.87 L (1871 cc)
    Difference from world average 20.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 170 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1588 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1970

    1970 100 Coupe S

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.87 L (1871 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.9 L (1871 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.9 L (1871 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.48 L smaller (-475 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 468 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6511 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.45 L bigger (+1447 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 85 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1970 Audi 100

  • 1.9 —1871 cc (1871 L)

    1970 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.9 —16.1 cc/hp (22 cc/kW)

    1970 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.9 —20.25 or 475 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.9 1.87 L
    (1871 cc)     		20.2% smaller 94 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 170 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.87 L (1871 cc)
    Difference from world average 20.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 94 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 170 cc to 100 kg

    Audi 100 1968

    1968 100 (C1)

    Quick notes on Audi 100 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.82 L (1816 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1761 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.9 L (1871 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.53 L smaller (-530 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 363 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6566 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.39 L bigger (+1392 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 85 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1968 Audi 100

  • 1.9 LS —1871 cc (1871 L)
  • 1.8 LS —1761 cc (1761 L)
  • 1.8 —1761 cc (1761 L)
  • 1.9 GL —1871 cc (1871 L)

    1968 Audi 100 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.9 LS —20.3 cc/hp (27.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 LS —15.2 cc/hp (20.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —19.6 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 GL —16.7 cc/hp (22.8 cc/kW)

    1968 Audi 100 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.9 LS —20.25 or 475 cc smaller
  • 1.8 LS —24.94 or 585 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —24.94 or 585 cc smaller
  • 1.9 GL —20.25 or 475 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.9 LS 1.87 L
    (1871 cc)     		20.2% smaller 85 cc to 1 mpg 49 hp from 1 L -
    1.8 LS 1.76 L
    (1761 cc)     		24.9% smaller 84 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.76 L
    (1761 cc)     		24.9% smaller 80 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 GL 1.87 L
    (1871 cc)     		20.2% smaller 85 cc to 1 mpg 60 hp from 1 L 170 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 LS
    Precise engine size 1.87 L (1871 cc)
    Difference from world average 20.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 85 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.8 LS
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1761 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 84 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1761 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 80 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 GL
    Precise engine size 1.87 L (1871 cc)
    Difference from world average 20.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 85 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 170 cc to 100 kg