cat_logo
HomeAudi

Coupe

Audi Coupe Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Audi Coupe

Audi Coupe 1991

Coupe (B3 89, facelift 1991)

Quick notes on Audi Coupe engine size

    • Average size for generation: 2.35 L (2353 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1984 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2.8 L (2771 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.01 L bigger (+7 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 15 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 471 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6 L smaller (-6029 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.93 L bigger (+1929 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 94 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1991 Audi Coupe

  • 2.6 V6 E —2598 cc (2598 L)
  • 2.8 V6 E —2771 cc (2771 L)
  • 2.3 E —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 2.0 E —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.0 16V —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • S2 2.2 —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.6 V6 E6 —2598 cc (2598 L)

    1991 Audi Coupe Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.6 V6 E —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.8 V6 E —15.9 cc/hp (21.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 E —17.4 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E —17.3 cc/hp (23.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 16V —14.5 cc/hp (19.6 cc/kW)
  • S2 2.2 —9.7 cc/hp (13.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.6 V6 E6 —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)

    1991 Audi Coupe Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.6 V6 E —10.74 or 252 cc bigger
  • 2.8 V6 E —18.12 or 425 cc bigger
  • 2.3 E —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.0 16V —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • S2 2.2 —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.6 V6 E6 —10.74 or 252 cc bigger

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.6 V6 E 2.6 L
    (2598 cc)     		10.7% bigger 100 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 200 cc to 100 kg
    2.8 V6 E 2.77 L
    (2771 cc)     		18.1% bigger 120 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 E 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 82 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 192 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 16V 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller - 69 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    S2 2.2 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 97 cc to 1 mpg 103 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    2.6 V6 E6 2.6 L
    (2598 cc)     		10.7% bigger 113 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 186 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.6 V6 E
    Precise engine size 2.6 L (2598 cc)
    Difference from world average 10.7 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 100 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 200 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.8 V6 E
    Precise engine size 2.77 L (2771 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 120 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 82 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 192 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle S2 2.2
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 97 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 103 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.6 V6 E6
    Precise engine size 2.6 L (2598 cc)
    Difference from world average 10.7 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 113 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 186 cc to 100 kg

    Audi Coupe 1988

    Coupe (B3 89)

    Quick notes on Audi Coupe engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.11 L (2112 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1781 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2309 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.23 L smaller (-234 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 15 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 422 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6270 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.69 L bigger (+1688 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 94 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1988 Audi Coupe

  • 2.0 E —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.3 E 20V —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 1.8 —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • 2.0 —1984 cc (1984 L)
  • 2.0 20V —1994 cc (1994 L)
  • S2 2.2 —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.3 —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 2.3 E —2309 cc (2309 L)

    1988 Audi Coupe Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 E —17.6 cc/hp (23.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 E 20V —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —15.9 cc/hp (21.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —17.3 cc/hp (23.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 20V —12.5 cc/hp (16.9 cc/kW)
  • S2 2.2 —10.1 cc/hp (13.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 —17 cc/hp (23.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 E —17.4 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)

    1988 Audi Coupe Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 E —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.3 E 20V —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.43 or 362 cc smaller
  • 2.0 20V —15 or 352 cc smaller
  • S2 2.2 —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.3 —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 2.3 E —1.58 or 37 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 E 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 73 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 E 20V 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller - 74 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller - 63 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.98 L
    (1984 cc)     		15.4% smaller 68 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 20V 1.99 L
    (1994 cc)     		15% smaller 95 cc to 1 mpg 80 hp from 1 L 142 cc to 100 kg
    S2 2.2 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 97 cc to 1 mpg 99 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller - 59 hp from 1 L 192 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 E 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller 86 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 73 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 E 20V
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1984 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 68 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 20V
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1994 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 95 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 80 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 142 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle S2 2.2
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 97 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 99 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 192 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 86 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg

    Audi Coupe 1987

    Coupe (B2 81, 85, facelift 1984)

    Quick notes on Audi Coupe engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.11 L (2107 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1781 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2309 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.24 L smaller (-239 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 421 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6275 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.68 L bigger (+1683 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 82 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1987 Audi Coupe

  • GT 2.2i —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.0i —1994 cc (1994 L)
  • GT 1.8 —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • 2.2i —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • GT 1.8i —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • 2.2 —2226 cc (2226 L)
  • 2.3 E —2309 cc (2309 L)
  • 2.3 —2309 cc (2309 L)

    1987 Audi Coupe Engine size to power ratio

  • GT 2.2i —16.4 cc/hp (22.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —17.3 cc/hp (23.5 cc/kW)
  • GT 1.8 —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)
  • 2.2i —19.4 cc/hp (26.2 cc/kW)
  • GT 1.8i —15.9 cc/hp (21.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 —16.4 cc/hp (22.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 E —17 cc/hp (23.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 —17 cc/hp (23.1 cc/kW)

    1987 Audi Coupe Difference from world average engine size

  • GT 2.2i —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —15 or 352 cc smaller
  • GT 1.8 —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • 2.2i —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • GT 1.8i —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • 2.2 —5.12 or 120 cc smaller
  • 2.3 E —1.58 or 37 cc smaller
  • 2.3 —1.58 or 37 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    GT 2.2i 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 202 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 1.99 L
    (1994 cc)     		15% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 181 cc to 100 kg
    GT 1.8 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller - 51 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    2.2i 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller - 52 hp from 1 L 202 cc to 100 kg
    GT 1.8i 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller - 63 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller - 61 hp from 1 L 186 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 E 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller - 59 hp from 1 L 210 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 2.31 L
    (2309 cc)     		1.6% smaller - 59 hp from 1 L 192 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle GT 2.2i
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 202 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1994 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 181 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle GT 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2i
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 202 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle GT 1.8i
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 186 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 210 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3
    Precise engine size 2.31 L (2309 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 192 cc to 100 kg

    Audi Coupe 1981

    Coupe (B2 81, 85)

    Quick notes on Audi Coupe engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.91 L (1909 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1588 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.2 L (2226 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.44 L smaller (-437 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 19 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 382 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6473 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.49 L bigger (+1485 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 78 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1981 Audi Coupe

  • GL 1.8 —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • GT 5S 2.0 —1921 cc (1921 L)
  • GL 1.6 —1588 cc (1588 L)
  • GT 1.8 —1781 cc (1781 L)
  • GT 5S 1.9 —1921 cc (1921 L)
  • GT 5E 2.2 —2144 cc (2144 L)
  • GT 2.2 —2226 cc (2226 L)

    1981 Audi Coupe Engine size to power ratio

  • GL 1.8 —23.7 cc/hp (32.4 cc/kW)
  • GT 5S 2.0 —16.7 cc/hp (22.6 cc/kW)
  • GL 1.6 —21.2 cc/hp (28.9 cc/kW)
  • GT 1.8 —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)
  • GT 5S 1.9 —16.7 cc/hp (22.6 cc/kW)
  • GT 5E 2.2 —16.5 cc/hp (22.3 cc/kW)
  • GT 2.2 —19.4 cc/hp (26.2 cc/kW)

    1981 Audi Coupe Difference from world average engine size

  • GL 1.8 —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • GT 5S 2.0 —18.12 or 425 cc smaller
  • GL 1.6 —32.31 or 758 cc smaller
  • GT 1.8 —24.08 or 565 cc smaller
  • GT 5S 1.9 —18.12 or 425 cc smaller
  • GT 5E 2.2 —8.61 or 202 cc smaller
  • GT 2.2 —5.12 or 120 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    GL 1.8 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller - 42 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    GT 5S 2.0 1.92 L
    (1921 cc)     		18.1% smaller - 60 hp from 1 L 192 cc to 100 kg
    GL 1.6 1.59 L
    (1588 cc)     		32.3% smaller - 47 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    GT 1.8 1.78 L
    (1781 cc)     		24.1% smaller - 51 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    GT 5S 1.9 1.92 L
    (1921 cc)     		18.1% smaller - 60 hp from 1 L 192 cc to 100 kg
    GT 5E 2.2 2.14 L
    (2144 cc)     		8.6% smaller - 61 hp from 1 L 214 cc to 100 kg
    GT 2.2 2.23 L
    (2226 cc)     		5.1% smaller - 52 hp from 1 L -
    Vehicle GL 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 42 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle GT 5S 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.92 L (1921 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 192 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle GL 1.6
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1588 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle GT 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.78 L (1781 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle GT 5S 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.92 L (1921 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 192 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle GT 5E 2.2
    Precise engine size 2.14 L (2144 cc)
    Difference from world average 8.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 214 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle GT 2.2
    Precise engine size 2.23 L (2226 cc)
    Difference from world average 5.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -