Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.58 L (1584 cc) |
32.5% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 T |
1.79 L (1793 cc) |
23.6% smaller | 75 cc to 1 mpg | 95 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.83 L (1834 cc) |
21.8% smaller | 68 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.58 L (1584 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 T |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1793 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 75 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 95 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.83 L (1834 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 68 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |