Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 16V TiD |
1.91 L (1910 cc) |
18.6% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0i 16V Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 105 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 i 16V Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 105 hp from 1 L | - |
2.8i V6 24V |
2.79 L (2792 cc) |
19% bigger | 127 cc to 1 mpg | 91 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.9 16V TiD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1910 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 105 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 105 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.8i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.79 L (2792 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 127 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 91 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |