Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 119 hp from 1 L | - |
3.6 V6 |
3.65 L (3649 cc) |
55.5% bigger | 182 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 119 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.65 L (3649 cc) |
Difference from world average | 55.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 182 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 |
3.65 L (3649 cc) |
55.5% bigger | 152 cc to 1 mpg | 86 hp from 1 L | 192 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 131 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
3.6 V6 |
3.65 L (3649 cc) |
55.5% bigger | - | 86 hp from 1 L | 192 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.65 L (3649 cc) |
Difference from world average | 55.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 152 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 86 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 192 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 131 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.65 L (3649 cc) |
Difference from world average | 55.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 86 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 192 cc to 100 kg |