Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 138 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
3.6 V6 |
3.64 L (3640 cc) |
55.2% bigger | - | 92 hp from 1 L | 214 cc to 100 kg |
ZL1 6.2 V8 |
6.16 L (6162 cc) |
162.7% bigger | - | 107 hp from 1 L | 324 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 138 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.64 L (3640 cc) |
Difference from world average | 55.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 92 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 214 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | ZL1 6.2 V8 |
Precise engine size | 6.16 L (6162 cc) |
Difference from world average | 162.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 107 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 324 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 138 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
3.6 V6 |
3.64 L (3640 cc) |
55.2% bigger | - | 92 hp from 1 L | 228 cc to 100 kg |
ZL1 6.2 V8 |
6.16 L (6162 cc) |
162.7% bigger | - | 107 hp from 1 L | 342 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 138 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.64 L (3640 cc) |
Difference from world average | 55.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 92 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 228 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | ZL1 6.2 V8 |
Precise engine size | 6.16 L (6162 cc) |
Difference from world average | 162.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 107 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 342 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.2 V8 |
6.16 L (6162 cc) |
162.7% bigger | 342 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 362 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 138 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
3.6 V6 |
3.64 L (3640 cc) |
55.2% bigger | - | 92 hp from 1 L | 228 cc to 100 kg |
ZL1 6.2 V8 |
6.16 L (6162 cc) |
162.7% bigger | - | 106 hp from 1 L | 342 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 6.16 L (6162 cc) |
Difference from world average | 162.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 342 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 362 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 138 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.64 L (3640 cc) |
Difference from world average | 55.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 92 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 228 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | ZL1 6.2 V8 |
Precise engine size | 6.16 L (6162 cc) |
Difference from world average | 162.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 342 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 138 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
6.2 V8 |
6.16 L (6162 cc) |
162.7% bigger | 308 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 342 cc to 100 kg |
3.6 V6 |
3.64 L (3640 cc) |
55.2% bigger | - | 92 hp from 1 L | 214 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 138 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
Precise engine size | 6.16 L (6162 cc) |
Difference from world average | 162.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 308 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 342 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.64 L (3640 cc) |
Difference from world average | 55.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 92 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 214 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.2 V8 |
6.16 L (6162 cc) |
162.7% bigger | 342 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 324 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 6.16 L (6162 cc) |
Difference from world average | 162.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 342 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 324 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.2 V8 |
6.16 L (6162 cc) |
162.7% bigger | 342 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 342 cc to 100 kg |
7.0 V8 |
7 L (6997 cc) |
198.3% bigger | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 412 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 6.16 L (6162 cc) |
Difference from world average | 162.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 342 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 342 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 7.0 V8 |
Precise engine size | 7 L (6997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 198.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 412 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.2 V8 |
6.16 L (6162 cc) |
162.7% bigger | 342 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 324 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 6.16 L (6162 cc) |
Difference from world average | 162.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 342 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 324 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.2 V8 |
6.16 L (6162 cc) |
162.7% bigger | 342 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 342 cc to 100 kg |
3.6 V6 |
3.56 L (3564 cc) |
51.9% bigger | - | 88 hp from 1 L | 210 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 6.16 L (6162 cc) |
Difference from world average | 162.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 342 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 342 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.56 L (3564 cc) |
Difference from world average | 51.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 88 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 210 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8 i V6 |
3.79 L (3791 cc) |
61.6% bigger | - | 54 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
5.7 i V8 |
5.67 L (5665 cc) |
141.5% bigger | 283 cc to 1 mpg | 55 hp from 1 L | 354 cc to 100 kg |
3.4 i V6 |
3.35 L (3352 cc) |
42.9% bigger | 152 cc to 1 mpg | 48 hp from 1 L | 223 cc to 100 kg |
5.7 i V8 Z28 |
5.67 L (5665 cc) |
141.5% bigger | - | 55 hp from 1 L | 354 cc to 100 kg |
SS 5.7 i V8 |
5.67 L (5665 cc) |
141.5% bigger | 333 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 354 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.79 L (3791 cc) |
Difference from world average | 61.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 |
Precise engine size | 5.67 L (5665 cc) |
Difference from world average | 141.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 283 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 354 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.4 i V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.35 L (3352 cc) |
Difference from world average | 42.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 152 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 48 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 223 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 Z28 |
Precise engine size | 5.67 L (5665 cc) |
Difference from world average | 141.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 354 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | SS 5.7 i V8 |
Precise engine size | 5.67 L (5665 cc) |
Difference from world average | 141.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 333 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 354 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.4 i V6 |
3.35 L (3352 cc) |
42.9% bigger | 168 cc to 1 mpg | 48 hp from 1 L | 223 cc to 100 kg |
5.7 i V8 Z28 |
5.67 L (5665 cc) |
141.5% bigger | - | 55 hp from 1 L | 354 cc to 100 kg |
5.7 i V8 |
5.67 L (5665 cc) |
141.5% bigger | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 354 cc to 100 kg |
3.8 i V6 |
3.79 L (3791 cc) |
61.6% bigger | - | 54 hp from 1 L | 237 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.4 i V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.35 L (3352 cc) |
Difference from world average | 42.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 168 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 48 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 223 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 Z28 |
Precise engine size | 5.67 L (5665 cc) |
Difference from world average | 141.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 354 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 |
Precise engine size | 5.67 L (5665 cc) |
Difference from world average | 141.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 354 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.79 L (3791 cc) |
Difference from world average | 61.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 237 cc to 100 kg |