Chevrolet Cobalt Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Chevrolet Cobalt 2006

- Average size for generation: 2.29 L (2291 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2.2 L (2198 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.4 L (2384 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.06 L smaller (-55 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 15 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 458 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.1 L smaller (-6091 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.87 L bigger (+1867 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 93 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2.2 i 16V —2198 cc (2198 L)

2.4 i 16V SS —2384 cc (2384 L)

2.2 i 16V —15.6 cc/hp (21.1 cc/kW)

2.4 i 16V SS —13.7 cc/hp (18.6 cc/kW)

2.2 i 16V —6.31 or 148 cc smaller

2.4 i 16V SS —1.62 or 38 cc bigger

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.2 i 16V	2.2 L (2198 cc)	6.3% smaller	76 cc to 1 mpg	64 hp from 1 L	169 cc to 100 kg
2.4 i 16V SS	2.38 L (2384 cc)	1.6% bigger	-	73 hp from 1 L	183 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.2 i 16V
Precise engine size	2.2 L (2198 cc)
Difference from world average	6.3 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	76 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	64 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	169 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.4 i 16V SS
Precise engine size	2.38 L (2384 cc)
Difference from world average	1.6 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	73 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	183 cc to 100 kg

- Average size for generation: 2.19 L (2193 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.4 L (2384 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.15 L smaller (-153 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 439 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.2 L smaller (-6189 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.77 L bigger (+1769 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 100 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2.2 i 16V SS —2198 cc (2198 L)

2.4 i 16V SS —2384 cc (2384 L)

2.0 i 16V SS —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.2 i 16V SS —15 cc/hp (20.4 cc/kW)

2.4 i 16V SS —13.7 cc/hp (18.6 cc/kW)

2.0 i 16V SS —9.7 cc/hp (13.2 cc/kW)

2.2 i 16V SS —6.31 or 148 cc smaller

2.4 i 16V SS —1.62 or 38 cc bigger

2.0 i 16V SS —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.2 i 16V SS	2.2 L (2198 cc)	6.3% smaller	-	67 hp from 1 L	157 cc to 100 kg
2.4 i 16V SS	2.38 L (2384 cc)	1.6% bigger	-	73 hp from 1 L	183 cc to 100 kg
2.0 i 16V SS	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	77 cc to 1 mpg	103 hp from 1 L	154 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.2 i 16V SS
Precise engine size	2.2 L (2198 cc)
Difference from world average	6.3 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	67 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	157 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.4 i 16V SS
Precise engine size	2.38 L (2384 cc)
Difference from world average	1.6 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	73 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	183 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 i 16V SS
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	77 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	103 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	154 cc to 100 kg