Chevrolet Orlando Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Chevrolet Orlando 2018

- Average size for generation: 1.35 L (1349 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1349 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1349 cc)
- Difference from world average: 1 L smaller (-997 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 8 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 270 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 7 L smaller (-7033 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 0.93 L bigger (+925 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 170 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 4 / 10

530T Ecotec —1349 cc (1349 L)

530T Ecotec —8.3 cc/hp (11.2 cc/kW)

530T Ecotec —42.5 or 997 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
530T Ecotec	1.35 L (1349 cc)	42.5% smaller	-	121 hp from 1 L	90 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	530T Ecotec
Precise engine size	1.35 L (1349 cc)
Difference from world average	42.5 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	121 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	90 cc to 100 kg

- Average size for generation: 1.74 L (1738 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.4 L (1362 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.61 L smaller (-608 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 248 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6644 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.31 L bigger (+1314 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 131 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 4 / 10

2.0 TD —1998 cc (1998 L)

1.8 16V —1796 cc (1796 L)

1.4 turbo —1362 cc (1362 L)

1.8 —1796 cc (1796 L)

2.0 TD —12.3 cc/hp (16.7 cc/kW)

1.8 16V —12.7 cc/hp (17.3 cc/kW)

1.4 turbo —9.7 cc/hp (13.2 cc/kW)

1.8 —12.7 cc/hp (17.3 cc/kW)

2.0 TD —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

1.8 16V —23.44 or 550 cc smaller

1.4 turbo —41.94 or 984 cc smaller

1.8 —23.44 or 550 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0 TD	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	59 cc to 1 mpg	82 hp from 1 L	118 cc to 100 kg
1.8 16V	1.8 L (1796 cc)	23.4% smaller	49 cc to 1 mpg	78 hp from 1 L	120 cc to 100 kg
1.4 turbo	1.36 L (1362 cc)	41.9% smaller	37 cc to 1 mpg	103 hp from 1 L	91 cc to 100 kg
1.8	1.8 L (1796 cc)	23.4% smaller	60 cc to 1 mpg	78 hp from 1 L	120 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.0 TD
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	59 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	82 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	118 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.8 16V
Precise engine size	1.8 L (1796 cc)
Difference from world average	23.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	49 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	78 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	120 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.4 turbo
Precise engine size	1.36 L (1362 cc)
Difference from world average	41.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	37 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	103 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	91 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.8
Precise engine size	1.8 L (1796 cc)
Difference from world average	23.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	60 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	78 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	120 cc to 100 kg