Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 129 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
3.6 V6 |
3.56 L (3564 cc) |
51.9% bigger | - | 88 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 129 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.56 L (3564 cc) |
Difference from world average | 51.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 88 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
3.56 L (3564 cc) |
51.9% bigger | 155 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.56 L (3564 cc) |
Difference from world average | 51.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 155 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
3.56 L (3564 cc) |
51.9% bigger | 155 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.56 L (3564 cc) |
Difference from world average | 51.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 155 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 162 cc to 100 kg |