Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 55 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 i |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | - | 86 hp from 1 L | 183 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 86 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 183 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 GLSi 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLSi 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |