Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 LE |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 V6 |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 LE |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 LE |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 LX V6 |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 LE |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 LX V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |