Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 Super |
1.02 L (1015 cc) |
56.7% smaller | - | 53 hp from 1 L | 127 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.0 Super |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.02 L (1015 cc) |
Difference from world average | 56.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 127 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 Super |
1.02 L (1015 cc) |
56.7% smaller | - | 53 hp from 1 L | 127 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.0 Super |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.02 L (1015 cc) |
Difference from world average | 56.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 127 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.6 |
0.6 L (602 cc) |
74.3% smaller | - | 58 hp from 1 L | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 0.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 0.6 L (602 cc) |
Difference from world average | 74.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.6 |
0.6 L (602 cc) |
74.3% smaller | - | 55 hp from 1 L | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 0.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 0.6 L (602 cc) |
Difference from world average | 74.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.6 |
0.6 L (602 cc) |
74.3% smaller | - | 58 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 0.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 0.6 L (602 cc) |
Difference from world average | 74.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.6 |
0.6 L (602 cc) |
74.3% smaller | - | 47 hp from 1 L | 86 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 0.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 0.6 L (602 cc) |
Difference from world average | 74.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 47 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 86 cc to 100 kg |