Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 BlueHDi |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 33 cc to 1 mpg | 60 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 THP |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 125 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 e-HDi |
1.56 L (1560 cc) |
33.5% smaller | 29 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 98 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 HDi |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Hybrid4 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 29 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 BlueHDi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 33 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 THP |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 125 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 e-HDi |
Precise engine size | 1.56 L (1560 cc) |
Difference from world average | 33.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 29 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 98 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Hybrid4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 29 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |