Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.56 L (1560 cc) |
33.5% smaller | 35 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 104 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 89 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 BlueHDi |
1.5 L (1499 cc) |
36.1% smaller | - | 80 hp from 1 L | 94 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 BlueHDi |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.56 L (1560 cc) |
Difference from world average | 33.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 35 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 104 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 BlueHDi |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1499 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 94 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 BlueHDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 |
1.56 L (1560 cc) |
33.5% smaller | 35 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 98 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 BlueHDi |
1.5 L (1499 cc) |
36.1% smaller | - | 80 hp from 1 L | 88 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 BlueHDi |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Precise engine size | 1.56 L (1560 cc) |
Difference from world average | 33.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 35 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 98 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 BlueHDi |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1499 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 88 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 BlueHDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.56 L (1560 cc) |
33.5% smaller | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 98 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 89 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 BlueHDi |
1.5 L (1499 cc) |
36.1% smaller | - | 80 hp from 1 L | 88 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 BlueHDi |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 89 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.56 L (1560 cc) |
Difference from world average | 33.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 98 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 BlueHDi |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1499 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 88 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 BlueHDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |