Citroen Xantia Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Average Engine Size Citroen Xantia

Quick notes on Citroen Xantia engine size

    • Average size for generation: 2.02 L (2024 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1762 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2.9 L (2946 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.32 L smaller (-322 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 405 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6358 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.6 L bigger (+1600 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 101 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1998 Citroen Xantia (X2) engine size

  • 3.0 V6 —2946 cc (2946 L)
  • 1.9 Turbo D —1905 cc (1905 L)
  • 2.0 i 16V —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.8 i 16V —1762 cc (1762 L)
  • 1.8 i —1762 cc (1762 L)
  • 1.9 D —1905 cc (1905 L)
  • 2.0 i —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 HDI 109 —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 Turbo —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.1 Turbo D 12V —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 2.0 HDI —1998 cc (1998 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 3.0 V6 —15.5 cc/hp (21 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 Turbo D —21.2 cc/hp (28.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V —15.1 cc/hp (20.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i —19.6 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 D —25.4 cc/hp (34.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i —16.5 cc/hp (22.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 HDI 109 —18.2 cc/hp (24.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 Turbo D 12V —18.3 cc/hp (25 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 HDI —18.3 cc/hp (25 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 3.0 V6 —25.58 or 600 cc bigger
  • 1.9 Turbo D —18.8 or 441 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i 16V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.8 i 16V —24.89 or 584 cc smaller
  • 1.8 i —24.89 or 584 cc smaller
  • 1.9 D —18.8 or 441 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 HDI 109 —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Turbo —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.1 Turbo D 12V —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 2.0 HDI —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    3.0 V6 2.95 L
    (2946 cc)
    25.6% bigger - 64 hp from 1 L 196 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 Turbo D 1.91 L
    (1905 cc)
    18.8% smaller - 47 hp from 1 L 147 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 16V 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 66 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i 16V 1.76 L
    (1762 cc)
    24.9% smaller - 63 hp from 1 L 136 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i 1.76 L
    (1762 cc)
    24.9% smaller - 51 hp from 1 L 147 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 D 1.91 L
    (1905 cc)
    18.8% smaller - 39 hp from 1 L 147 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 61 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 HDI 109 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 44 cc to 1 mpg 55 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Turbo 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 74 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 Turbo D 12V 2 L
    (1997 cc)
    14.9% smaller - 55 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 HDI 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 55 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Precise engine size 2.95 L (2946 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.6 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 64 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 196 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 Turbo D
    Precise engine size 1.91 L (1905 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 147 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1762 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 136 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1762 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 147 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Precise engine size 1.91 L (1905 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 39 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 147 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 HDI 109
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 44 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 Turbo D 12V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 HDI
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Citroen Xantia engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.04 L (2039 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1762 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.9 L (2946 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.31 L smaller (-307 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 408 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6343 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.62 L bigger (+1615 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 92 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1998 Citroen Xantia Break (X2) engine size

  • 2.0 i 16V —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 3.0 V6 —2946 cc (2946 L)
  • 1.8 i —1762 cc (1762 L)
  • 1.8 i 16V —1762 cc (1762 L)
  • 1.9 SD —1905 cc (1905 L)
  • 2.0 Turbo —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.9 Turbo D —1905 cc (1905 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 i 16V —15.1 cc/hp (20.6 cc/kW)
  • 3.0 V6 —15.5 cc/hp (21 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i —19.6 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 SD —25.4 cc/hp (34.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 Turbo D —21.2 cc/hp (28.9 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 i 16V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 3.0 V6 —25.58 or 600 cc bigger
  • 1.8 i —24.89 or 584 cc smaller
  • 1.8 i 16V —24.89 or 584 cc smaller
  • 1.9 SD —18.8 or 441 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Turbo —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.9 Turbo D —18.8 or 441 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 i 16V 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 66 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    3.0 V6 2.95 L
    (2946 cc)
    25.6% bigger - 64 hp from 1 L 196 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i 1.76 L
    (1762 cc)
    24.9% smaller - 51 hp from 1 L 136 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i 16V 1.76 L
    (1762 cc)
    24.9% smaller - 63 hp from 1 L 136 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 SD 1.91 L
    (1905 cc)
    18.8% smaller - 39 hp from 1 L 136 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Turbo 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 74 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 Turbo D 1.91 L
    (1905 cc)
    18.8% smaller - 47 hp from 1 L 136 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Precise engine size 2.95 L (2946 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.6 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 64 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 196 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1762 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 136 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1762 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 136 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 SD
    Precise engine size 1.91 L (1905 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 39 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 136 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 Turbo D
    Precise engine size 1.91 L (1905 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 136 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Citroen Xantia engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.93 L (1932 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1762 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.41 L smaller (-414 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 386 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6450 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.51 L bigger (+1508 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 97 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1993 Citroen Xantia Break (X1) engine size

  • 1.9 Turbo D —1905 cc (1905 L)
  • 1.8 i 16V —1762 cc (1762 L)
  • 2.0 i 16V —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 Turbo —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 i —1998 cc (1998 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.9 Turbo D —21.2 cc/hp (28.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V —15.1 cc/hp (20.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i —16.5 cc/hp (22.4 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.9 Turbo D —18.8 or 441 cc smaller
  • 1.8 i 16V —24.89 or 584 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i 16V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Turbo —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.9 Turbo D 1.91 L
    (1905 cc)
    18.8% smaller 53 cc to 1 mpg 47 hp from 1 L 136 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i 16V 1.76 L
    (1762 cc)
    24.9% smaller 59 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 136 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 16V 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 74 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Turbo 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 80 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 80 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 Turbo D
    Precise engine size 1.91 L (1905 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 53 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 136 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1762 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 59 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 136 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 74 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 80 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 80 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Citroen Xantia engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.89 L (1888 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1580 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.1 L (2088 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.46 L smaller (-458 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 378 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6494 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.46 L bigger (+1464 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 94 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1993 Citroen Xantia (X1) engine size

  • 2.0 i —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.9 D —1905 cc (1905 L)
  • 1.8 i —1762 cc (1762 L)
  • 1.8 i 16V —1762 cc (1762 L)
  • 1.6 i —1580 cc (1580 L)
  • 1.9 Turbo D —1905 cc (1905 L)
  • 2.0 i 16V —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 Turbo —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.1 Turbo D 12V —2088 cc (2088 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 i —16.2 cc/hp (22.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 D —27.6 cc/hp (37.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i —17.4 cc/hp (23.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 i —18 cc/hp (24.3 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 Turbo D —21.2 cc/hp (28.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 Turbo D 12V —19.2 cc/hp (26.1 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 i —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.9 D —18.8 or 441 cc smaller
  • 1.8 i —24.89 or 584 cc smaller
  • 1.8 i 16V —24.89 or 584 cc smaller
  • 1.6 i —32.65 or 766 cc smaller
  • 1.9 Turbo D —18.8 or 441 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i 16V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Turbo —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.1 Turbo D 12V —11 or 258 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 i 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 74 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 D 1.91 L
    (1905 cc)
    18.8% smaller 50 cc to 1 mpg 36 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i 1.76 L
    (1762 cc)
    24.9% smaller 61 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 147 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i 16V 1.76 L
    (1762 cc)
    24.9% smaller 59 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 147 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 i 1.58 L
    (1580 cc)
    32.7% smaller 53 cc to 1 mpg 56 hp from 1 L 132 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 Turbo D 1.91 L
    (1905 cc)
    18.8% smaller 50 cc to 1 mpg 47 hp from 1 L 147 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 16V 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Turbo 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 80 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 Turbo D 12V 2.09 L
    (2088 cc)
    11% smaller 56 cc to 1 mpg 52 hp from 1 L 149 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 74 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Precise engine size 1.91 L (1905 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 50 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 36 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1762 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 61 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 147 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1762 cc)
    Difference from world average 24.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 59 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 147 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 i
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1580 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 53 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 132 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 Turbo D
    Precise engine size 1.91 L (1905 cc)
    Difference from world average 18.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 50 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 147 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 80 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 Turbo D 12V
    Precise engine size 2.09 L (2088 cc)
    Difference from world average 11 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 56 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 149 cc to 100 kg