Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 |
2.95 L (2946 cc) |
25.6% bigger | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 196 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 Turbo D |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | - | 47 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | - | 51 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 D |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | - | 39 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 HDI 109 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 55 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.1 Turbo D 12V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 55 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 HDI |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 55 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.95 L (2946 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 196 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 Turbo D |
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 47 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 51 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 39 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI 109 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.1 Turbo D 12V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 |
2.95 L (2946 cc) |
25.6% bigger | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 196 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | - | 51 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 SD |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | - | 39 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 Turbo D |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | - | 47 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.95 L (2946 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 196 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 51 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 SD |
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 39 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 Turbo D |
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 47 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 Turbo D |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 47 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 Turbo D |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 47 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 D |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 36 hp from 1 L | 159 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i |
1.58 L (1580 cc) |
32.7% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 56 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 Turbo D |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 47 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.1 Turbo D 12V |
2.09 L (2088 cc) |
11% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 52 hp from 1 L | 149 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 36 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 159 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Precise engine size | 1.58 L (1580 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 Turbo D |
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 47 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.1 Turbo D 12V |
Precise engine size | 2.09 L (2088 cc) |
Difference from world average | 11 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 149 cc to 100 kg |