cat_logo
HomeCitroen

Xm

Citroen XM Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Citroen XM

Citroen XM 1994

1995 XM Break (Y4)

Quick notes on Citroen XM engine size

    • Average size for generation: 2.3 L (2299 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 3 L (2963 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.05 L smaller (-47 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 460 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.1 L smaller (-6083 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.88 L bigger (+1875 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 103 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1994 Citroen XM

  • 3.0 V6 —2963 cc (2963 L)
  • 2.1 TD 12V —2088 cc (2088 L)
  • 2.0 Turbo —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 i 16V —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.5 TD —2446 cc (2446 L)

    1994 Citroen XM Engine size to power ratio

  • 3.0 V6 —17.7 cc/hp (24.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 TD 12V —19.2 cc/hp (26.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V —15.1 cc/hp (20.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 TD —19 cc/hp (25.7 cc/kW)

    1994 Citroen XM Difference from world average engine size

  • 3.0 V6 —26.3 or 617 cc bigger
  • 2.1 TD 12V —11 or 258 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Turbo —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i 16V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.5 TD —4.26 or 100 cc bigger

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    3.0 V6 2.96 L
    (2963 cc)     		26.3% bigger - 56 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 TD 12V 2.09 L
    (2088 cc)     		11% smaller - 52 hp from 1 L 139 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Turbo 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 74 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 16V 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 66 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 TD 2.45 L
    (2446 cc)     		4.3% bigger - 53 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Precise engine size 2.96 L (2963 cc)
    Difference from world average 26.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Precise engine size 2.09 L (2088 cc)
    Difference from world average 11 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 139 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Precise engine size 2.45 L (2446 cc)
    Difference from world average 4.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg

    Citroen XM 1994

    1995 XM (Y4)

    Quick notes on Citroen XM engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.41 L (2407 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3 L (2963 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.06 L bigger (+61 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 481 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6 L smaller (-5975 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.98 L bigger (+1983 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 102 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1994 Citroen XM

  • 3.0 V6 —2946 cc (2946 L)
  • 2.1 TD 12V —2088 cc (2088 L)
  • 2.0 Turbo —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 i 16V —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.5 TD —2446 cc (2446 L)
  • 3.0 V6 24V —2963 cc (2963 L)

    1994 Citroen XM Engine size to power ratio

  • 3.0 V6 —15.5 cc/hp (21 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 TD 12V —19.2 cc/hp (26.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V —15.1 cc/hp (20.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 TD —19 cc/hp (25.7 cc/kW)
  • 3.0 V6 24V —14.8 cc/hp (20.2 cc/kW)

    1994 Citroen XM Difference from world average engine size

  • 3.0 V6 —25.58 or 600 cc bigger
  • 2.1 TD 12V —11 or 258 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Turbo —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i 16V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.5 TD —4.26 or 100 cc bigger
  • 3.0 V6 24V —26.3 or 617 cc bigger

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    3.0 V6 2.95 L
    (2946 cc)     		25.6% bigger - 64 hp from 1 L 184 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 TD 12V 2.09 L
    (2088 cc)     		11% smaller - 52 hp from 1 L 149 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Turbo 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 74 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 16V 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 66 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 TD 2.45 L
    (2446 cc)     		4.3% bigger - 53 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    3.0 V6 24V 2.96 L
    (2963 cc)     		26.3% bigger 141 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Precise engine size 2.95 L (2946 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.6 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 64 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 184 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Precise engine size 2.09 L (2088 cc)
    Difference from world average 11 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 149 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Precise engine size 2.45 L (2446 cc)
    Difference from world average 4.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.0 V6 24V
    Precise engine size 2.96 L (2963 cc)
    Difference from world average 26.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 141 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg

    Citroen XM 1991

    1990 XM Break (Y3)

    Quick notes on Citroen XM engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.24 L (2239 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3 L (2975 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.11 L smaller (-107 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 448 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.1 L smaller (-6143 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.82 L bigger (+1815 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 92 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1991 Citroen XM

  • 2.0 i —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.1 D 12V —2138 cc (2138 L)
  • 2.0 i Turbo CT —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.1 TD 12V —2088 cc (2088 L)
  • 3.0 i V6 —2975 cc (2975 L)

    1991 Citroen XM Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 i —16.5 cc/hp (22.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 D 12V —26.1 cc/hp (35.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i Turbo CT —13.8 cc/hp (18.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 TD 12V —19.2 cc/hp (26.1 cc/kW)
  • 3.0 i V6 —17.5 cc/hp (23.8 cc/kW)

    1991 Citroen XM Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 i —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.1 D 12V —8.87 or 208 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i Turbo CT —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.1 TD 12V —11 or 258 cc smaller
  • 3.0 i V6 —26.81 or 629 cc bigger

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 i 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 D 12V 2.14 L
    (2138 cc)     		8.9% smaller 63 cc to 1 mpg 38 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i Turbo CT 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 TD 12V 2.09 L
    (2088 cc)     		11% smaller 58 cc to 1 mpg 52 hp from 1 L 139 cc to 100 kg
    3.0 i V6 2.98 L
    (2975 cc)     		26.8% bigger 124 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 D 12V
    Precise engine size 2.14 L (2138 cc)
    Difference from world average 8.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 63 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 38 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i Turbo CT
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Precise engine size 2.09 L (2088 cc)
    Difference from world average 11 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 58 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 139 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6
    Precise engine size 2.98 L (2975 cc)
    Difference from world average 26.8 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 124 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg

    Citroen XM 1989

    1990 XM (Y3)

    Quick notes on Citroen XM engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.36 L (2362 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3 L (2975 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.02 L bigger (+16 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 472 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6 L smaller (-6020 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.94 L bigger (+1938 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 91 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1989 Citroen XM

  • 2.0 i TCT —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 i —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.1 D 12V —2138 cc (2138 L)
  • 2.1 TD 12V —2088 cc (2088 L)
  • 3.0 i V6 24V —2975 cc (2975 L)
  • 3.0 i V6 —2975 cc (2975 L)

    1989 Citroen XM Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 i TCT —13.8 cc/hp (18.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i —16.5 cc/hp (22.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 D 12V —26.1 cc/hp (35.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 TD 12V —19 cc/hp (25.8 cc/kW)
  • 3.0 i V6 24V —14.9 cc/hp (20.2 cc/kW)
  • 3.0 i V6 —17.5 cc/hp (23.8 cc/kW)

    1989 Citroen XM Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 i TCT —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.1 D 12V —8.87 or 208 cc smaller
  • 2.1 TD 12V —11 or 258 cc smaller
  • 3.0 i V6 24V —26.81 or 629 cc bigger
  • 3.0 i V6 —26.81 or 629 cc bigger

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 i TCT 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 74 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 D 12V 2.14 L
    (2138 cc)     		8.9% smaller 61 cc to 1 mpg 38 hp from 1 L 164 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 TD 12V 2.09 L
    (2088 cc)     		11% smaller 58 cc to 1 mpg 53 hp from 1 L 149 cc to 100 kg
    3.0 i V6 24V 2.98 L
    (2975 cc)     		26.8% bigger 129 cc to 1 mpg 67 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    3.0 i V6 2.98 L
    (2975 cc)     		26.8% bigger 124 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 213 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i TCT
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 74 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 D 12V
    Precise engine size 2.14 L (2138 cc)
    Difference from world average 8.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 61 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 38 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 164 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Precise engine size 2.09 L (2088 cc)
    Difference from world average 11 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 58 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 149 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6 24V
    Precise engine size 2.98 L (2975 cc)
    Difference from world average 26.8 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 129 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6
    Precise engine size 2.98 L (2975 cc)
    Difference from world average 26.8 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 124 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 213 cc to 100 kg