Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 53 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 53 hp from 1 L | 163 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 i 16V |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 40 cc to 1 mpg | 60 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 163 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 40 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |