Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V |
1.8 L (1799 cc) |
23.3% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1799 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V CDX |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V CDX |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V CDX |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V CDX |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |