Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 16V |
2.36 L (2360 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 148 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2360 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 148 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 V6 |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |