Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TD |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 104 cc to 100 kg |
2.7 |
2.74 L (2736 cc) |
16.6% bigger | 119 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 i 16V |
2.36 L (2360 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 98 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 131 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 104 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Precise engine size | 2.74 L (2736 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 119 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2360 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 98 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 131 cc to 100 kg |