Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 L |
2.74 L (2736 cc) |
16.6% bigger | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.43 L (2429 cc) |
3.5% bigger | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 L |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.74 L (2736 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.43 L (2429 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4i 16V |
2.35 L (2351 cc) |
0.2% bigger | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 168 cc to 100 kg |
3.0i V6 24V R/T |
2.97 L (2972 cc) |
26.7% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 198 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2351 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V R/T |
Precise engine size | 2.97 L (2972 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 198 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.43 L (2429 cc) |
3.5% bigger | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 162 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.43 L (2429 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |