Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
1.75 L (1747 cc) |
25.5% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V Turbo |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 95 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 20V Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 110 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 20V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 77 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.75 L (1747 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 95 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 20V Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 110 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 20V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |