Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Multijet |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | - | 87 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.36 L (2360 cc) |
0.6% bigger | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 E-Torq |
1.75 L (1747 cc) |
25.5% smaller | - | 79 hp from 1 L | 103 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Multijet |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2360 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 E-Torq |
Precise engine size | 1.75 L (1747 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 103 cc to 100 kg |