Fiat Ulysse Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

2003 Ulysse II (179)
1994 Ulysse I (22/220)

Average Engine Size Fiat Ulysse

Fiat Ulysse 2002

Quick notes on Fiat Ulysse engine size

- Average size for generation: 2.28 L (2280 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.9 L (2946 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.07 L smaller (-66 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 456 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.1 L smaller (-6102 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.86 L bigger (+1856 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 116 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2002 Fiat Ulysse

2.0 16V —1997 cc (1997 L)

3.0 V6 24V —2946 cc (2946 L)

2.2 16V JTD —2179 cc (2179 L)

2.0 16V JTD —1997 cc (1997 L)

2002 Fiat Ulysse Engine size to power ratio

2.0 16V —14.7 cc/hp (20 cc/kW)

3.0 V6 24V —14.4 cc/hp (19.6 cc/kW)

2.2 16V JTD —17 cc/hp (23.2 cc/kW)

2.0 16V JTD —18.7 cc/hp (25.3 cc/kW)

2002 Fiat Ulysse Difference from world average engine size

2.0 16V —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

3.0 V6 24V —25.58 or 600 cc bigger

2.2 16V JTD —7.12 or 167 cc smaller

2.0 16V JTD —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0 16V	2 L (1997 cc)	14.9% smaller	77 cc to 1 mpg	68 hp from 1 L	125 cc to 100 kg
3.0 V6 24V	2.95 L (2946 cc)	25.6% bigger	147 cc to 1 mpg	69 hp from 1 L	164 cc to 100 kg
2.2 16V JTD	2.18 L (2179 cc)	7.1% smaller	68 cc to 1 mpg	59 hp from 1 L	121 cc to 100 kg
2.0 16V JTD	2 L (1997 cc)	14.9% smaller	61 cc to 1 mpg	54 hp from 1 L	117 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.0 16V
Precise engine size	2 L (1997 cc)
Difference from world average	14.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	77 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	68 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	125 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	3.0 V6 24V
Precise engine size	2.95 L (2946 cc)
Difference from world average	25.6 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	147 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	69 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	164 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.2 16V JTD
Precise engine size	2.18 L (2179 cc)
Difference from world average	7.1 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	68 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	59 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	121 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 16V JTD
Precise engine size	2 L (1997 cc)
Difference from world average	14.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	61 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	54 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	117 cc to 100 kg

Fiat Ulysse 1996

Quick notes on Fiat Ulysse engine size

- Average size for generation: 1.96 L (1958 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1762 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.1 L (2088 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.39 L smaller (-388 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 326 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6424 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.53 L bigger (+1534 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 106 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1996 Fiat Ulysse

1.8 —1762 cc (1762 L)

2.0 —1998 cc (1998 L)

1.9 TD —1905 cc (1905 L)

2.0 JTD —1997 cc (1997 L)

2.0 Turbo —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.1 TD —2088 cc (2088 L)

1996 Fiat Ulysse Engine size to power ratio

1.8 —17.8 cc/hp (24.1 cc/kW)

2.0 —16.5 cc/hp (22.4 cc/kW)

1.9 TD —21.2 cc/hp (28.9 cc/kW)

2.0 JTD —18.3 cc/hp (25 cc/kW)

2.0 Turbo —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)

2.1 TD —19.2 cc/hp (26.1 cc/kW)

1996 Fiat Ulysse Difference from world average engine size

1.8 —24.89 or 584 cc smaller

2.0 —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

1.9 TD —18.8 or 441 cc smaller

2.0 JTD —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

2.0 Turbo —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

2.1 TD —11 or 258 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
1.8	1.76 L (1762 cc)	24.9% smaller	-	56 hp from 1 L	126 cc to 100 kg
2.0	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	91 cc to 1 mpg	61 hp from 1 L	133 cc to 100 kg
1.9 TD	1.91 L (1905 cc)	18.8% smaller	64 cc to 1 mpg	47 hp from 1 L	119 cc to 100 kg
2.0 JTD	2 L (1997 cc)	14.9% smaller	-	55 hp from 1 L	125 cc to 100 kg
2.0 Turbo	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	83 cc to 1 mpg	74 hp from 1 L	125 cc to 100 kg
2.1 TD	2.09 L (2088 cc)	11% smaller	70 cc to 1 mpg	52 hp from 1 L	123 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	1.8
Precise engine size	1.76 L (1762 cc)
Difference from world average	24.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	56 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	126 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	91 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	61 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	133 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.9 TD
Precise engine size	1.91 L (1905 cc)
Difference from world average	18.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	64 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	47 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	119 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 JTD
Precise engine size	2 L (1997 cc)
Difference from world average	14.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	55 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	125 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 Turbo
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	83 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	74 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	125 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.1 TD
Precise engine size	2.09 L (2088 cc)
Difference from world average	11 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	70 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	52 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	123 cc to 100 kg