cat_logo
HomeFord

C-max

Ford C-MAX Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Ford C-MAX

Ford C-MAX 2015

2015 C-MAX II (facelift 2015)

Quick notes on Ford C-MAX engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.58 L (1581 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1 L (998 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.77 L smaller (-765 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 316 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.8 L smaller (-6801 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.16 L bigger (+1157 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 149 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

2015 Ford C-MAX

  • 1.0 EcoBoost —998 cc (998 L)
  • 1.5 EcoBoost —1499 cc (1499 L)
  • 1.6 Ti-VCT —1596 cc (1596 L)
  • 1.5 TDCi —1499 cc (1499 L)
  • 2.0 TDCi —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 1.6 TDCi —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • 1.5 ECOnetic —1500 cc (1500 L)
  • 2.0 —1999 cc (1999 L)

    2015 Ford C-MAX Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.0 EcoBoost —10 cc/hp (13.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 EcoBoost —10 cc/hp (13.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 Ti-VCT —18.8 cc/hp (25.3 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 TDCi —12.5 cc/hp (17 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 TDCi —11.7 cc/hp (16 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 TDCi —13.6 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 ECOnetic —14.3 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —14.2 cc/hp (19.2 cc/kW)

    2015 Ford C-MAX Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.0 EcoBoost —57.46 or 1348 cc smaller
  • 1.5 EcoBoost —36.1 or 847 cc smaller
  • 1.6 Ti-VCT —31.97 or 750 cc smaller
  • 1.5 TDCi —36.1 or 847 cc smaller
  • 2.0 TDCi —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 1.6 TDCi —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • 1.5 ECOnetic —36.06 or 846 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —14.79 or 347 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.0 EcoBoost 1 L
    (998 cc)     		57.5% smaller 22 cc to 1 mpg 100 hp from 1 L 71 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 EcoBoost 1.5 L
    (1499 cc)     		36.1% smaller 42 cc to 1 mpg 100 hp from 1 L 107 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 Ti-VCT 1.6 L
    (1596 cc)     		32% smaller 43 cc to 1 mpg 53 hp from 1 L 114 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 TDCi 1.5 L
    (1499 cc)     		36.1% smaller 28 cc to 1 mpg 80 hp from 1 L 100 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 TDCi 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 41 cc to 1 mpg 85 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 TDCi 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)     		33.5% smaller 30 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 111 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 ECOnetic 1.5 L
    (1500 cc)     		36.1% smaller 24 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 115 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 2 L
    (1999 cc)     		14.8% smaller 53 cc to 1 mpg 71 hp from 1 L 111 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.0 EcoBoost
    Precise engine size 1 L (998 cc)
    Difference from world average 57.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 22 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 100 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 71 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 EcoBoost
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1499 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 42 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 100 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 107 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 Ti-VCT
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1596 cc)
    Difference from world average 32 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 43 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 114 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 TDCi
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1499 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 28 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 80 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 100 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 41 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 85 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 TDCi
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 30 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 111 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 ECOnetic
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1500 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 24 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 115 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 53 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 111 cc to 100 kg

    Ford C-MAX 2015

    2015 Grand C-MAX (facelift 2015)

    Quick notes on Ford C-MAX engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.53 L (1525 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1 L (998 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.82 L smaller (-821 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 11 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 218 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.9 L smaller (-6857 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.1 L bigger (+1101 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 158 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2015 Ford C-MAX

  • 1.0 EcoBoost —998 cc (998 L)
  • 1.5 EcoBoost —1499 cc (1499 L)
  • 1.6 Ti-VCT —1596 cc (1596 L)
  • 1.5 TDCi —1499 cc (1499 L)
  • 1.6 TDCi —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • 2.0 TDCi —1997 cc (1997 L)

    2015 Ford C-MAX Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.0 EcoBoost —8 cc/hp (10.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 EcoBoost —8.2 cc/hp (11.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 Ti-VCT —13.3 cc/hp (18.1 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 TDCi —12.5 cc/hp (17 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 TDCi —13.6 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 TDCi —11.7 cc/hp (16 cc/kW)

    2015 Ford C-MAX Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.0 EcoBoost —57.46 or 1348 cc smaller
  • 1.5 EcoBoost —36.1 or 847 cc smaller
  • 1.6 Ti-VCT —31.97 or 750 cc smaller
  • 1.5 TDCi —36.1 or 847 cc smaller
  • 1.6 TDCi —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • 2.0 TDCi —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.0 EcoBoost 1 L
    (998 cc)     		57.5% smaller 22 cc to 1 mpg 125 hp from 1 L 67 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 EcoBoost 1.5 L
    (1499 cc)     		36.1% smaller 43 cc to 1 mpg 121 hp from 1 L 100 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 Ti-VCT 1.6 L
    (1596 cc)     		32% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 106 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 TDCi 1.5 L
    (1499 cc)     		36.1% smaller 28 cc to 1 mpg 80 hp from 1 L 100 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 TDCi 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)     		33.5% smaller 33 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 104 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 TDCi 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 42 cc to 1 mpg 85 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.0 EcoBoost
    Precise engine size 1 L (998 cc)
    Difference from world average 57.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 22 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 125 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 67 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 EcoBoost
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1499 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 43 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 121 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 100 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 Ti-VCT
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1596 cc)
    Difference from world average 32 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 106 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 TDCi
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1499 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 28 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 80 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 100 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 TDCi
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 33 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 104 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 42 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 85 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg

    Ford C-MAX 2007

    2007 C-MAX (Facelift 2007)

    Quick notes on Ford C-MAX engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.78 L (1784 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1560 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.56 L smaller (-562 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 15 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 357 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6598 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.36 L bigger (+1360 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 123 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2007 Ford C-MAX

  • 1.6 TDCi —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • 1.8 TDCi —1753 cc (1753 L)
  • 2.0 TDCI —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 2.0 16V —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 1.8 16V —1798 cc (1798 L)
  • 1.6 16V —1596 cc (1596 L)

    2007 Ford C-MAX Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 TDCi —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 TDCi —15.2 cc/hp (20.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 TDCI —14.7 cc/hp (20 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 16V —13.8 cc/hp (18.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 16V —14.4 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 16V —16 cc/hp (21.6 cc/kW)

    2007 Ford C-MAX Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 TDCi —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • 1.8 TDCi —25.28 or 593 cc smaller
  • 2.0 TDCI —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 2.0 16V —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 1.8 16V —23.36 or 548 cc smaller
  • 1.6 16V —31.97 or 750 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 TDCi 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)     		33.5% smaller - 58 hp from 1 L -
    1.8 TDCi 1.75 L
    (1753 cc)     		25.3% smaller - 66 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 TDCI 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 49 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 16V 2 L
    (1999 cc)     		14.8% smaller 62 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 16V 1.8 L
    (1798 cc)     		23.4% smaller 54 cc to 1 mpg 69 hp from 1 L 128 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 16V 1.6 L
    (1596 cc)     		32% smaller 47 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 123 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 TDCi
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.8 TDCi
    Precise engine size 1.75 L (1753 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCI
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 49 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 16V
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1798 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 54 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 128 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1596 cc)
    Difference from world average 32 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 47 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 123 cc to 100 kg

    Ford C-MAX 2003

    2004 C-MAX

    Quick notes on Ford C-MAX engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.82 L (1815 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1560 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.53 L smaller (-531 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 363 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6567 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.39 L bigger (+1391 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 120 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2003 Ford C-MAX

  • 1.6 TDCi —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • 1.8 TDCi —1753 cc (1753 L)
  • 1.8 16V —1798 cc (1798 L)
  • 2.0 —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 1.6 16V —1596 cc (1596 L)
  • 2.0 16V —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 2.0 TDCi —1997 cc (1997 L)

    2003 Ford C-MAX Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 TDCi —14.3 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 TDCi —15.2 cc/hp (20.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 16V —15 cc/hp (20.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —13.8 cc/hp (18.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 16V —13.8 cc/hp (18.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 16V —13.8 cc/hp (18.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 TDCi —14.7 cc/hp (20 cc/kW)

    2003 Ford C-MAX Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 TDCi —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • 1.8 TDCi —25.28 or 593 cc smaller
  • 1.8 16V —23.36 or 548 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 1.6 16V —31.97 or 750 cc smaller
  • 2.0 16V —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 2.0 TDCi —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 TDCi 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)     		33.5% smaller 33 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 TDCi 1.75 L
    (1753 cc)     		25.3% smaller - 66 hp from 1 L -
    1.8 16V 1.8 L
    (1798 cc)     		23.4% smaller 54 cc to 1 mpg 67 hp from 1 L 138 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 2 L
    (1999 cc)     		14.8% smaller 62 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L -
    1.6 16V 1.6 L
    (1596 cc)     		32% smaller 44 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 16V 2 L
    (1999 cc)     		14.8% smaller 62 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 TDCi 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 48 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 TDCi
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 33 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 TDCi
    Precise engine size 1.75 L (1753 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.8 16V
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1798 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 54 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 138 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1596 cc)
    Difference from world average 32 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 44 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 48 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg