| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBoost |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 123 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.7 EcoBoost V6 |
2.69 L (2688 cc) |
14.6% bigger | 128 cc to 1 mpg | 125 hp from 1 L | 134 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 123 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.7 EcoBoost V6 |
| Precise engine size | 2.69 L (2688 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.6 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 128 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 125 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 134 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TDCi |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 105 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
| 3.5 V6 |
3.5 L (3496 cc) |
49% bigger | 175 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.7 V6 |
2.72 L (2720 cc) |
15.9% bigger | 136 cc to 1 mpg | 116 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.0 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 123 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 105 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
| Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3496 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 49 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 175 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
| Precise engine size | 2.72 L (2720 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 15.9 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 136 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 116 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 |
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 123 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 V6 |
3.5 L (3496 cc) |
49% bigger | 159 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.0 V4 |
2 L (2000 cc) |
14.7% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 121 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
| 3.7 V6 |
3.72 L (3721 cc) |
58.6% bigger | 196 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | - |
| Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3496 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 49 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 159 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 V4 |
| Precise engine size | 2 L (2000 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.7 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 121 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
| Precise engine size | 3.72 L (3721 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 58.6 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 196 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 V6 |
3.5 L (3496 cc) |
49% bigger | - | 76 hp from 1 L | 194 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3496 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 49 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 194 cc to 100 kg |
