Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBoost |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 125 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 EcoBoost |
1.5 L (1497 cc) |
36.2% smaller | - | 120 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
2.5L |
2.49 L (2491 cc) |
6.2% bigger | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 125 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5L |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2491 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 EcoBoost |
1.5 L (1499 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 119 hp from 1 L | 88 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 EcoBoost |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 123 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 Duratec |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 104 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1499 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 119 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 88 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 123 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 Duratec |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 104 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBoost |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 EcoBoost |
1.6 L (1596 cc) |
32% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 111 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 Duratec |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 100 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1596 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 111 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 Duratec |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 100 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 L |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 L |
2.5 L (2495 cc) |
6.4% bigger | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 L |
2.97 L (2966 cc) |
26.4% bigger | 124 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 185 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 L |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 L |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2495 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 L |
Precise engine size | 2.97 L (2966 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 124 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 185 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3i 16V |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | - | 69 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 i 16V XLS |
1.99 L (1988 cc) |
15.3% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V XLS 4WD |
1.99 L (1988 cc) |
15.3% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 i 16V Hybrid |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | - | 60 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 i 16V Hybrid AWD |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | - | 60 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 i V6 24V XLT |
2.98 L (2976 cc) |
26.9% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 198 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 i V6 24V XLT 4WD |
2.98 L (2976 cc) |
26.9% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 186 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V XLS |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1988 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V XLS 4WD |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1988 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V Hybrid |
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V Hybrid AWD |
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V XLT |
Precise engine size | 2.98 L (2976 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 198 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V XLT 4WD |
Precise engine size | 2.98 L (2976 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 186 cc to 100 kg |