Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 107 hp from 1 L | 87 cc to 100 kg |
3.2 DuratorqTDCi |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 114 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 107 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 87 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.2 DuratorqTDCi |
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 114 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 Duratorq TDCi |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 114 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.2 Duratorq TDCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 114 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |