Ford Galaxy Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Average Engine Size Ford Galaxy

Ford Galaxy 2018

2015 Galaxy III

Quick notes on Ford Galaxy engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.9 L (1898 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.45 L smaller (-448 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 9 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 316 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6484 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.47 L bigger (+1474 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 204 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2018 Ford Galaxy

  • 1.5 EcoBoost —1498 cc (1498 L)
  • 2.0 EcoBoost —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 2.0 TDCi —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 2.0 EcoBlue —1997 cc (1997 L)

    2018 Ford Galaxy Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.5 EcoBoost —9.1 cc/hp (12.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 EcoBoost —8.3 cc/hp (11.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 TDCi —9.5 cc/hp (13 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo —8.3 cc/hp (11.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 EcoBlue —10.5 cc/hp (14.3 cc/kW)

    2018 Ford Galaxy Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.5 EcoBoost —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • 2.0 EcoBoost —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 2.0 TDCi —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 2.0 EcoBlue —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.5 EcoBoost 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)
    36.1% smaller 48 cc to 1 mpg 110 hp from 1 L 94 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 EcoBoost 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 67 cc to 1 mpg 120 hp from 1 L 118 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 TDCi 2 L
    (1997 cc)
    14.9% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 105 hp from 1 L 117 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo 2 L
    (1997 cc)
    14.9% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 120 hp from 1 L 117 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 EcoBlue 2 L
    (1997 cc)
    14.9% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 95 hp from 1 L 111 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 EcoBoost
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 48 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 110 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 94 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBoost
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 67 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 120 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 118 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 105 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 117 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 120 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 117 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBlue
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 95 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 111 cc to 100 kg

    Ford Galaxy 2007

    2006 Galaxy II

    Quick notes on Ford Galaxy engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.03 L (2031 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1753 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2261 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.32 L smaller (-315 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 290 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6351 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.61 L bigger (+1607 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 137 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2007 Ford Galaxy

  • 1.8 TDCi —1753 cc (1753 L)
  • 2.0 i 16V —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 2.0 TDCi —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 2.0 —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 2.2 TDCi —2179 cc (2179 L)
  • 2.3 i 16V —2261 cc (2261 L)

    2007 Ford Galaxy Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.8 TDCi —14 cc/hp (19.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V —13.8 cc/hp (18.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 TDCi —14.3 cc/hp (19.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —13.8 cc/hp (18.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 TDCi —12.5 cc/hp (16.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 i 16V —14 cc/hp (19.2 cc/kW)

    2007 Ford Galaxy Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.8 TDCi —25.28 or 593 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i 16V —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 2.0 TDCi —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 2.2 TDCi —7.12 or 167 cc smaller
  • 2.3 i 16V —3.62 or 85 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.8 TDCi 1.75 L
    (1753 cc)
    25.3% smaller - 71 hp from 1 L 103 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 16V 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 73 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 TDCi 2 L
    (1997 cc)
    14.9% smaller - 70 hp from 1 L 117 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 62 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 TDCi 2.18 L
    (2179 cc)
    7.1% smaller 62 cc to 1 mpg 80 hp from 1 L 128 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 i 16V 2.26 L
    (2261 cc)
    3.6% smaller 94 cc to 1 mpg 71 hp from 1 L 141 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 TDCi
    Precise engine size 1.75 L (1753 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 103 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 117 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 TDCi
    Precise engine size 2.18 L (2179 cc)
    Difference from world average 7.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 80 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 128 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 i 16V
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2261 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 94 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 141 cc to 100 kg

    Ford Galaxy 1996

    1995 Galaxy (WGR)

    Quick notes on Ford Galaxy engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.43 L (2428 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.9 L (1896 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.8 L (2792 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.08 L bigger (+82 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 15 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 347 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6 L smaller (-5954 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2 L bigger (+2004 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 97 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1996 Ford Galaxy

  • 2.8i V6 —2792 cc (2792 L)
  • 1.9 TDI —1896 cc (1896 L)
  • 2.3 16V —2295 cc (2295 L)
  • 2.8 V6 —2792 cc (2792 L)
  • 2.0 i —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.8i V6 4x4 —2792 cc (2792 L)

    1996 Ford Galaxy Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.8i V6 —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 TDI —14.6 cc/hp (19.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 16V —15.8 cc/hp (21.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.8 V6 —13.7 cc/hp (18.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i —17.2 cc/hp (23.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.8i V6 4x4 —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)

    1996 Ford Galaxy Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.8i V6 —19.01 or 446 cc bigger
  • 1.9 TDI —19.18 or 450 cc smaller
  • 2.3 16V —2.17 or 51 cc smaller
  • 2.8 V6 —19.01 or 446 cc bigger
  • 2.0 i —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.8i V6 4x4 —19.01 or 446 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.8i V6 2.79 L
    (2792 cc)
    19% bigger - 62 hp from 1 L 155 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 TDI 1.9 L
    (1896 cc)
    19.2% smaller 53 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 112 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 16V 2.3 L
    (2295 cc)
    2.2% smaller 100 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.8 V6 2.79 L
    (2792 cc)
    19% bigger 127 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L 164 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 87 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 118 cc to 100 kg
    2.8i V6 4x4 2.79 L
    (2792 cc)
    19% bigger - 62 hp from 1 L 155 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.8i V6
    Precise engine size 2.79 L (2792 cc)
    Difference from world average 19 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 155 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 TDI
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1896 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 53 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 112 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 16V
    Precise engine size 2.3 L (2295 cc)
    Difference from world average 2.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 100 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.8 V6
    Precise engine size 2.79 L (2792 cc)
    Difference from world average 19 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 127 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 164 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 87 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 118 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.8i V6 4x4
    Precise engine size 2.79 L (2792 cc)
    Difference from world average 19 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 155 cc to 100 kg