Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 EcoBoost |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 110 hp from 1 L | 94 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 EcoBoost |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDCi |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 105 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 EcoBlue |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 95 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 110 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 94 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 105 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 95 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 TDCi |
1.75 L (1753 cc) |
25.3% smaller | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 103 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDCi |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 TDCi |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 i 16V |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | 94 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.75 L (1753 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 103 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 94 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8i V6 |
2.79 L (2792 cc) |
19% bigger | - | 62 hp from 1 L | 155 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 TDI |
1.9 L (1896 cc) |
19.2% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 16V |
2.3 L (2295 cc) |
2.2% smaller | 100 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.8 V6 |
2.79 L (2792 cc) |
19% bigger | 127 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
2.8i V6 4x4 |
2.79 L (2792 cc) |
19% bigger | - | 62 hp from 1 L | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.8i V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.79 L (2792 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Precise engine size | 1.9 L (1896 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.3 L (2295 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 100 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.8 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.79 L (2792 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 127 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.8i V6 4x4 |
Precise engine size | 2.79 L (2792 cc) |
Difference from world average | 19 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 155 cc to 100 kg |