2019 Ranger III Raptor (facelift 2019)
2019 Ranger III Super Cab (facelift 2019)
2019 Ranger III Double Cab (facelift 2019)
2019 Ranger III Regular Cab (facelift 2019)
2019 Ranger IV SuperCrew (Americas)
2019 Ranger IV SuperCab (Americas)
2019 Ranger IV Raptor (Americas)
2015 Ranger III Double Cab (facelift 2015)
2015 Ranger III Single Cab (facelift 2015)
2015 Ranger III Super Cab (facelift 2015)
Ranger III Double Cab
Ranger III Super Cab
2009 Ranger II Super Cab (facelift 2009)
2009 Ranger II Double Cab (facelift 2009)
2006 Ranger II Super Cab
2006 Ranger II Double Cab
Ranger I Super Cab
Ranger I Double Cab
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBlue |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 107 hp from 1 L | 80 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 107 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 80 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBlue |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 95 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 95 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBlue |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 107 hp from 1 L | 91 cc to 100 kg |
| 3.2 Duratorq TDCi |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 128 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 107 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 91 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 3.2 Duratorq TDCi |
| Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 128 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 EcoBlue |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 EcoBoost |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | 103 cc to 1 mpg | 119 hp from 1 L | - |
| Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 103 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 119 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 EcoBoost |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | 103 cc to 1 mpg | 119 hp from 1 L | - |
| Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 103 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 119 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0d |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 107 hp from 1 L | 87 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.0d |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 107 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 87 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 TDCi |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | 76 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
| 3.2 TDCi |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 123 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 76 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
| Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 123 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 TDCi |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 129 cc to 100 kg |
| 3.2 TDCi |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 114 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.5 |
2.5 L (2499 cc) |
6.5% bigger | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 129 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
| Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 114 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 |
| Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2499 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2 TDCi |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 118 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.2 TDCi |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | 65 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 110 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 118 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
| Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 65 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 110 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 TDCi |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 110 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.5 |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 113 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 124 cc to 100 kg |
| 3.2 TDCi |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 139 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 110 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 |
| Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 113 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 124 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
| Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 139 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 113 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 124 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.2 TDCi |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | 88 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 110 cc to 100 kg |
| 3.2 TDCi |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 128 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 113 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 124 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
| Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 88 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 110 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 3.2 TDCi |
| Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 128 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TDCi |
2.5 L (2499 cc) |
6.5% bigger | - | 57 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2499 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TDCi |
2.5 L (2499 cc) |
6.5% bigger | - | 57 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2499 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 |
2.26 L (2255 cc) |
3.9% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | - |
| 4.0 V6 |
4.01 L (4014 cc) |
71.1% bigger | - | 52 hp from 1 L | - |
| 3.0 TDCi |
2.95 L (2953 cc) |
25.9% bigger | 128 cc to 1 mpg | 53 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.5 TDCi |
2.5 L (2499 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 96 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2255 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 3.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
| Precise engine size | 4.01 L (4014 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 71.1 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | 3.0 TDCi |
| Precise engine size | 2.95 L (2953 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 25.9 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 128 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
| Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2499 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 96 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TDCi |
2.5 L (2500 cc) |
6.6% bigger | - | 57 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
| 4.0 V6 |
4.01 L (4014 cc) |
71.1% bigger | - | 52 hp from 1 L | - |
| 2.3 |
2.26 L (2255 cc) |
3.9% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | - |
| 3.0 TDCi |
2.95 L (2953 cc) |
25.9% bigger | 128 cc to 1 mpg | 53 hp from 1 L | - |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2500 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.6 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
| Precise engine size | 4.01 L (4014 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 71.1 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | 2.3 |
| Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2255 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 3.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | 3.0 TDCi |
| Precise engine size | 2.95 L (2953 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 25.9 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | 128 cc to 1 mpg |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TDCi |
2.5 L (2499 cc) |
6.5% bigger | - | 44 hp from 1 L | - |
| 4.0 V6 |
4.01 L (4014 cc) |
71.1% bigger | - | 52 hp from 1 L | 287 cc to 100 kg |
| 2.3 |
2.26 L (2255 cc) |
3.9% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 161 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2499 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 44 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
| Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
| Precise engine size | 4.01 L (4014 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 71.1 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 287 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.3 |
| Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2255 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 3.9 smaller |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 161 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 TDCi |
2.5 L (2499 cc) |
6.5% bigger | - | 44 hp from 1 L | 179 cc to 100 kg |
| Vehicle | 2.5 TDCi |
|---|---|
| Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2499 cc) |
| Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
| Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
| Horsepower from 1 L | 44 hp from 1 L |
| Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 179 cc to 100 kg |
