Ford S-MAX Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Average Engine Size Ford S-MAX

Quick notes on Ford S-MAX engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.9 L (1898 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.45 L smaller (-448 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 11 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 271 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6484 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.47 L bigger (+1474 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 183 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2016 Ford S-MAX II engine size

  • 1.5 EcoBoost —1498 cc (1498 L)
  • 2.0 EcoBoost —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 2.0 TDCi —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 2.0 EcoBlue —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue —1997 cc (1997 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.5 EcoBoost —9.4 cc/hp (12.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 EcoBoost —8.3 cc/hp (11.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 TDCi —16.6 cc/hp (22.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 EcoBlue —16.6 cc/hp (22.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue —8.3 cc/hp (11.3 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.5 EcoBoost —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • 2.0 EcoBoost —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 2.0 TDCi —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 2.0 EcoBlue —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.5 EcoBoost 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)
    36.1% smaller 42 cc to 1 mpg 107 hp from 1 L 94 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 EcoBoost 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 120 hp from 1 L 118 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 TDCi 2 L
    (1997 cc)
    14.9% smaller 42 cc to 1 mpg 60 hp from 1 L 117 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 EcoBlue 2 L
    (1997 cc)
    14.9% smaller 43 cc to 1 mpg 60 hp from 1 L 117 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue 2 L
    (1997 cc)
    14.9% smaller 50 cc to 1 mpg 120 hp from 1 L 111 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 EcoBoost
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 42 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 107 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 94 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBoost
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 120 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 118 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 42 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 117 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBlue
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 43 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 117 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 50 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 120 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 111 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Ford S-MAX engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.12 L (2119 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1753 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2522 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.23 L smaller (-227 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 303 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6263 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.7 L bigger (+1695 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 135 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2005 Ford S-MAX engine size

  • 1.8 TDCi —1753 cc (1753 L)
  • 2.0 i 16V —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 2.0 TDCi —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 2.2 TDCi —2179 cc (2179 L)
  • 2.3 T —2261 cc (2261 L)
  • 2.5 i 20V —2522 cc (2522 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.8 TDCi —17.5 cc/hp (23.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V —13.8 cc/hp (18.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 TDCi —14.3 cc/hp (19.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 TDCi —12.5 cc/hp (16.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 T —14 cc/hp (19.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 i 20V —11.5 cc/hp (15.6 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.8 TDCi —25.28 or 593 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i 16V —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 2.0 TDCi —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 2.2 TDCi —7.12 or 167 cc smaller
  • 2.3 T —3.62 or 85 cc smaller
  • 2.5 i 20V —7.5 or 176 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.8 TDCi 1.75 L
    (1753 cc)
    25.3% smaller - 57 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 i 16V 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 TDCi 2 L
    (1997 cc)
    14.9% smaller 54 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 117 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 TDCi 2.18 L
    (2179 cc)
    7.1% smaller 61 cc to 1 mpg 80 hp from 1 L 128 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 T 2.26 L
    (2261 cc)
    3.6% smaller 90 cc to 1 mpg 71 hp from 1 L 141 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 i 20V 2.52 L
    (2522 cc)
    7.5% bigger 101 cc to 1 mpg 87 hp from 1 L 148 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 TDCi
    Precise engine size 1.75 L (1753 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 54 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 117 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 TDCi
    Precise engine size 2.18 L (2179 cc)
    Difference from world average 7.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 61 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 80 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 128 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 T
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2261 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 90 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 141 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 i 20V
    Precise engine size 2.52 L (2522 cc)
    Difference from world average 7.5 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 101 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 87 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 148 cc to 100 kg