Ford Sierra Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Average Engine Size Ford Sierra

Ford Sierra 1990

1987 Sierra Sedan

Quick notes on Ford Sierra engine size

    • Average size for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.35 L smaller (-348 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 400 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6384 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.57 L bigger (+1574 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 89 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1990 Ford Sierra

  • 2.0i —1998 cc (1998 L)

    1990 Ford Sierra Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0i —16 cc/hp (21.7 cc/kW)

    1990 Ford Sierra Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0i —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0i 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg

    Ford Sierra 1988

    1987 Sierra Hatchback II

    Quick notes on Ford Sierra engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.08 L (2075 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1597 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.9 L (2933 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.27 L smaller (-271 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 415 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6307 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.65 L bigger (+1651 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 82 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1988 Ford Sierra

  • 2.0i —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.8 —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 1.8 TD —1753 cc (1753 L)
  • 2.0 —1993 cc (1993 L)
  • 1.6 —1597 cc (1597 L)
  • 1.6 i —1597 cc (1597 L)
  • 2.9 i XR 4x4 —2933 cc (2933 L)
  • 2.9 i —2933 cc (2933 L)

    1988 Ford Sierra Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0i —16.7 cc/hp (22.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —22.5 cc/hp (30.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 TD —23.4 cc/hp (31.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —19 cc/hp (25.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 —22.2 cc/hp (30.1 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 i —17.7 cc/hp (24.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.9 i XR 4x4 —19.6 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.9 i —20.2 cc/hp (27.4 cc/kW)

    1988 Ford Sierra Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0i —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 1.8 TD —25.28 or 593 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.05 or 353 cc smaller
  • 1.6 —31.93 or 749 cc smaller
  • 1.6 i —31.93 or 749 cc smaller
  • 2.9 i XR 4x4 —25.02 or 587 cc bigger
  • 2.9 i —25.02 or 587 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0i 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 60 hp from 1 L -
    1.8 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)
    23.4% smaller - 44 hp from 1 L -
    1.8 TD 1.75 L
    (1753 cc)
    25.3% smaller - 43 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 1.99 L
    (1993 cc)
    15% smaller - 53 hp from 1 L -
    1.6 1.6 L
    (1597 cc)
    31.9% smaller - 45 hp from 1 L -
    1.6 i 1.6 L
    (1597 cc)
    31.9% smaller - 56 hp from 1 L -
    2.9 i XR 4x4 2.93 L
    (2933 cc)
    25% bigger - 51 hp from 1 L -
    2.9 i 2.93 L
    (2933 cc)
    25% bigger - 49 hp from 1 L -
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 44 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.8 TD
    Precise engine size 1.75 L (1753 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 43 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1993 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.6
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1597 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 45 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.6 i
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1597 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.9 i XR 4x4
    Precise engine size 2.93 L (2933 cc)
    Difference from world average 25 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.9 i
    Precise engine size 2.93 L (2933 cc)
    Difference from world average 25 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -

    Ford Sierra 1982

    1983 Sierra Hatchback I

    Quick notes on Ford Sierra engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.11 L (2111 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1597 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.8 L (2792 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.24 L smaller (-235 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 21 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 422 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6271 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.69 L bigger (+1687 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 79 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1982 Ford Sierra

  • 1.6 —1597 cc (1597 L)
  • 2.0 —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.8 —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 2.0i —1993 cc (1993 L)
  • 2.3 —2294 cc (2294 L)
  • 2.3 D —2304 cc (2304 L)
  • 2.8 XR4i —2792 cc (2792 L)

    1982 Ford Sierra Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 —21.3 cc/hp (29 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —22.2 cc/hp (30.3 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —20 cc/hp (27.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —17.3 cc/hp (23.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 —20.1 cc/hp (27.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 D —34.4 cc/hp (47 cc/kW)
  • 2.8 XR4i —18.6 cc/hp (25.4 cc/kW)

    1982 Ford Sierra Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 —31.93 or 749 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —15.05 or 353 cc smaller
  • 2.3 —2.22 or 52 cc smaller
  • 2.3 D —1.79 or 42 cc smaller
  • 2.8 XR4i —19.01 or 446 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 1.6 L
    (1597 cc)
    31.9% smaller - 47 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 45 hp from 1 L -
    1.8 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)
    23.4% smaller - 50 hp from 1 L -
    2.0i 1.99 L
    (1993 cc)
    15% smaller - 58 hp from 1 L -
    2.3 2.29 L
    (2294 cc)
    2.2% smaller - 50 hp from 1 L -
    2.3 D 2.3 L
    (2304 cc)
    1.8% smaller - 29 hp from 1 L 192 cc to 100 kg
    2.8 XR4i 2.79 L
    (2792 cc)
    19% bigger - 54 hp from 1 L -
    Vehicle 1.6
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1597 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 45 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1993 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.3
    Precise engine size 2.29 L (2294 cc)
    Difference from world average 2.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.3 D
    Precise engine size 2.3 L (2304 cc)
    Difference from world average 1.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 29 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 192 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.8 XR4i
    Precise engine size 2.79 L (2792 cc)
    Difference from world average 19 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 54 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -