Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0L |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.4L |
2.38 L (2378 cc) |
1.4% bigger | 119 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 140 cc to 100 kg |
1.8T |
1.8 L (1799 cc) |
23.3% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 102 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0L |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4L |
Precise engine size | 2.38 L (2378 cc) |
Difference from world average | 1.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 119 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 140 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8T |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1799 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 102 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |