Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 GDIT |
1.5 L (1499 cc) |
36.1% smaller | - | 109 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 GDIT |
1.97 L (1967 cc) |
16.2% smaller | - | 96 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 GDIT |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1499 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 109 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDIT |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1967 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 96 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
1.97 L (1967 cc) |
16.2% smaller | - | 100 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1967 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 |
1.5 L (1497 cc) |
36.2% smaller | - | 100 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |