Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V ECOTEC |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 163 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 100 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i 16V ECOTEC |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V ECOTEC |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 163 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V ECOTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 100 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i 16V ECOTEC |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 163 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i 16V ECOTEC |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V ECOTEC |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 163 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V ECOTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 100 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i 16V ECOTEC |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V ECOTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |