Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 i 16V |
2.2 L (2198 cc) |
6.3% smaller | 81 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 i V6 24V |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 89 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 81 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 89 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |