2018 Accord X
2016 Accord IX (facelift 2016)
2016 Accord IX Coupe (facelift 2016)
2012 Accord IX Coupe
2012 Accord IX
2011 Accord VIII (facelift 2011) Wagon
2008 Accord VIII
2011 Accord VIII (facelift 2011)
2008 Accord VIII Wagon
2008 Accord VIII Coupe
2002 Accord VII Wagon
2002 Accord VII
2002 Accord VII Coupe
1998 Accord VI Coupe
1998 Accord VI Hatchback
1998 Accord VI Wagon
1998 Accord VI (CE,CF)
1996 Accord V (CC7, facelift 1996)
1993 Accord V Coupe (CD7)
1993 Accord V (CC7)
1993 Accord V Wagon (CE)
1990 Accord IV Coupe (CC1)
1990 Accord IV Wagon (CB8)
1990 Accord IV (CB3,CB7)
1976 Accord I Hatchback (SJ,SY)
1976 Accord I (SJ,SY)
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sport 1.5 Turbo |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 128 hp from 1 L | 107 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 126 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1993 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Sport 1.5 Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 128 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 107 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 126 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1993 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
3.47 L (3471 cc) |
48% bigger | 134 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 217 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1993 cc) |
15% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.36 L (2356 cc) |
0.4% bigger | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.47 L (3471 cc) |
Difference from world average | 48 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 134 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 217 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1993 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2356 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
3.47 L (3471 cc) |
48% bigger | 139 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 217 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.36 L (2356 cc) |
0.4% bigger | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.47 L (3471 cc) |
Difference from world average | 48 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 139 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 217 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2356 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
3.47 L (3471 cc) |
48% bigger | 134 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 217 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.36 L (2356 cc) |
0.4% bigger | 81 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.47 L (3471 cc) |
Difference from world average | 48 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 134 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 217 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2356 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 81 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
1.99 L (1993 cc) |
15% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
3.5 V6 |
3.47 L (3471 cc) |
48% bigger | 139 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 217 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.36 L (2356 cc) |
0.4% bigger | 84 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1993 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.47 L (3471 cc) |
Difference from world average | 48 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 139 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 217 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2356 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 84 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 i-VTEC |
2.35 L (2354 cc) |
0.3% bigger | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 86 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 i-DTEC |
2.2 L (2199 cc) |
6.3% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2354 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 86 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2199 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.4i Automatic |
2.35 L (2354 cc) |
0.3% bigger | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 86 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
2.4i MT |
2.35 L (2354 cc) |
0.3% bigger | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
3.5i V6 Automatic |
3.47 L (3471 cc) |
48% bigger | - | 77 hp from 1 L | 231 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 i-DTEC |
2.2 L (2199 cc) |
6.3% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 137 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 i-DTEC Type S |
2.2 L (2199 cc) |
6.3% smaller | 52 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4i Automatic |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2354 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 86 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4i MT |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2354 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5i V6 Automatic |
Precise engine size | 3.47 L (3471 cc) |
Difference from world average | 48 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 231 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2199 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC Type S |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2199 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 52 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 i-DTEC |
2.2 L (2199 cc) |
6.3% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 137 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 i-VTEC |
2.35 L (2354 cc) |
0.3% bigger | 84 cc to 1 mpg | 86 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2199 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2354 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 84 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 86 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 i-Dtec |
2.2 L (2199 cc) |
6.3% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 129 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.35 L (2354 cc) |
0.3% bigger | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 86 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-Dtec |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2199 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 129 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2354 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 86 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4i 16V |
2.35 L (2354 cc) |
0.3% bigger | 94 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
3.5i V6 |
3.47 L (3471 cc) |
48% bigger | 158 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 231 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2354 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 94 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5i V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.47 L (3471 cc) |
Difference from world average | 48 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 158 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 231 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 78 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 i-CTDi |
2.2 L (2204 cc) |
6.1% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
2.35 L (2354 cc) |
0.3% bigger | - | 81 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-CTDi |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2204 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2354 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
2.35 L (2354 cc) |
0.3% bigger | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 168 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i-VTEC 16V Sport |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 i-CTDi |
2.2 L (2204 cc) |
6.1% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
2.35 L (2354 cc) |
0.3% bigger | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2354 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V Sport |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-CTDi |
Precise engine size | 2.2 L (2204 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2354 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V |
2.35 L (2354 cc) |
0.3% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 168 cc to 100 kg |
3.0i V6 24V |
3 L (2997 cc) |
27.7% bigger | - | 80 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2354 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 24V |
3 L (2997 cc) |
27.7% bigger | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1590 cc) |
32.2% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i |
1.85 L (1850 cc) |
21.1% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 53 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.3i 16V |
2.25 L (2254 cc) |
3.9% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1590 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Precise engine size | 1.85 L (1850 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.25 L (2254 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 16V |
2.25 L (2254 cc) |
3.9% smaller | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.25 L (2254 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
1.59 L (1590 cc) |
32.2% smaller | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 16V |
1.85 L (1850 cc) |
21.1% smaller | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo Di |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 53 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 Type-R |
2.16 L (2157 cc) |
8.1% smaller | - | 98 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 16V |
2.25 L (2254 cc) |
3.9% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1590 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.85 L (1850 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo Di |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 Type-R |
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2157 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 98 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.25 L (2254 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
1.85 L (1850 cc) |
21.1% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TDi |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 53 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i VTEC |
2.16 L (2155 cc) |
8.1% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.85 L (1850 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDi |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i VTEC |
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2155 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2i ES |
2.16 L (2156 cc) |
8.1% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i ES |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2156 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i S |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 i SR |
2.26 L (2259 cc) |
3.7% smaller | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 174 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i S |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 i SR |
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2259 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 174 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2i ES |
2.16 L (2155 cc) |
8.1% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i LS 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i ES |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2155 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i LS 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 i 16V |
2.16 L (2155 cc) |
8.1% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 180 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2155 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 180 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 i 16V |
2.16 L (2155 cc) |
8.1% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2155 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
1.85 L (1850 cc) |
21.1% smaller | 66 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 45 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 i 16V |
2.16 L (2155 cc) |
8.1% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.85 L (1850 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 66 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 45 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2155 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 EX |
1.6 L (1602 cc) |
31.7% smaller | - | 50 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 EX |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1602 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 50 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 EX |
1.6 L (1602 cc) |
31.7% smaller | - | 50 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 EX |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1602 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 50 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |