Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 |
2.16 L (2157 cc) |
8.1% smaller | 90 cc to 1 mpg | 112 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2157 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 90 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 112 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |