Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
1.97 L (1973 cc) |
15.9% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V 4WD |
1.97 L (1973 cc) |
15.9% smaller | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1973 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1973 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |