Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V |
2.35 L (2354 cc) |
0.3% bigger | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2354 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
1.97 L (1973 cc) |
15.9% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1973 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |