Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.7i |
1.67 L (1668 cc) |
28.9% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 119 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 4WD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 79 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7i |
Precise engine size | 1.67 L (1668 cc) |
Difference from world average | 28.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 119 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 4WD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |