Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.85 i |
1.85 L (1850 cc) |
21.1% smaller | - | 76 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V SiR |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 90 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 i |
2.16 L (2156 cc) |
8.1% smaller | - | 102 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.85 i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.85 L (1850 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V SiR |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 90 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 i |
Precise engine size | 2.16 L (2156 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 102 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |