2020 Sonata VIII (DN8)
2017 Sonata VII (LF facelift 2017)
2015 Sonata VII (LF)
2010 Sonata VI (YF)
2008 Sonata V (NF, facelift 2008)
2005 Sonata V (NF)
2001 Sonata IV (EF, facelift 2001)
1998 Sonata IV (EF)
1996 Sonata III (Y3, facelift 1996)
1993 Sonata III (Y3)
1991 Sonata II (Y2, facelift 1991)
1988 Sonata II (Y2)
1985 Sonata I (Y)
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 T-GDI |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 52 cc to 1 mpg | 113 hp from 1 L | 107 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 GDI |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | 78 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GDI |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 T-GDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 52 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 113 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 107 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 GDI |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 78 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 GDi |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 103 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GDi |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 123 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 103 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 123 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 GDi |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 T-GDi Eco |
1.59 L (1591 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 113 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 T-GDi |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 124 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GDi |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 T-GDi Eco |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1591 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 113 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T-GDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 124 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 66 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 GDI |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 79 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo GDI |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 136 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 66 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 79 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo GDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 136 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
GLS 2.4 |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 94 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CRDi |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 124 cc to 100 kg |
3.3 V6 |
3.34 L (3342 cc) |
42.5% bigger | 139 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 209 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | GLS 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 94 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 124 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.34 L (3342 cc) |
Difference from world average | 42.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 139 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 209 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7i V6 |
2.66 L (2656 cc) |
13.2% bigger | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 177 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CRDi 16V |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 124 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 VGT 16V |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 124 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.4i 16V |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
3.3i V6 24V |
3.34 L (3342 cc) |
42.5% bigger | 145 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 209 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7i V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.66 L (2656 cc) |
Difference from world average | 13.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 177 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 124 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 VGT 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 124 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.3i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 3.34 L (3342 cc) |
Difference from world average | 42.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 145 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 209 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 V6 GLS |
2.66 L (2656 cc) |
13.2% bigger | 111 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 190 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V GLS |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 V6 |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | 96 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 GLS |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.66 L (2656 cc) |
Difference from world average | 13.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 111 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 190 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V GLS |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 96 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
1.84 L (1836 cc) |
21.7% smaller | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 74 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.35 L (2351 cc) |
0.2% bigger | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 168 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i V6 GLS |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | 104 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 V6 |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 192 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1836 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2351 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 168 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 GLS |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 104 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 192 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.84 L (1836 cc) |
21.7% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GSi 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 58 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
3.0i V6 GLS |
2.97 L (2972 cc) |
26.7% bigger | 149 cc to 1 mpg | 49 hp from 1 L | 212 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i GLS |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 48 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1836 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GSi 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 GLS |
Precise engine size | 2.97 L (2972 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 149 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 212 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i GLS |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 48 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i GLS 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GLS |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 53 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
3.0i GLS V6 |
2.97 L (2972 cc) |
26.7% bigger | 124 cc to 1 mpg | 49 hp from 1 L | 229 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i GLS 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLS |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0i GLS V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.97 L (2972 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 124 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 229 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 GLS V6 |
2.97 L (2972 cc) |
26.7% bigger | 129 cc to 1 mpg | 49 hp from 1 L | 212 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i GLS 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 GLS V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.97 L (2972 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 129 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 212 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i GLS 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 53 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 51 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.35 L (2351 cc) |
0.2% bigger | 94 cc to 1 mpg | 49 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 |
2.97 L (2972 cc) |
26.7% bigger | 129 cc to 1 mpg | 49 hp from 1 L | 229 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 51 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2351 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 94 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.97 L (2972 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 129 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 229 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 55 hp from 1 L | - |
1.8i |
1.8 L (1795 cc) |
23.5% smaller | - | 56 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1795 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |