Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 47 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 |
1.6 L (1597 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 47 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
1.4 |
1.44 L (1439 cc) |
38.7% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 47 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 47 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Precise engine size | 1.44 L (1439 cc) |
Difference from world average | 38.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |