Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | - |
GT 2.7 V6 |
2.7 L (2700 cc) |
15.1% bigger | - | 64 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | GT 2.7 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.7 L (2700 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |