Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CRD i |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
2.7 i V6 24V |
2.66 L (2656 cc) |
13.2% bigger | 126 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 140 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRD i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.66 L (2656 cc) |
Difference from world average | 13.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 126 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 140 cc to 100 kg |