Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 |
3.5 L (3498 cc) |
49.1% bigger | 97 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 194 cc to 100 kg |
2.2d |
2.14 L (2143 cc) |
8.7% smaller | 41 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 134 cc to 100 kg |
2.0t |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 106 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
S 3.0t |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 204 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
3.0t V6 |
3 L (2997 cc) |
27.7% bigger | 136 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 3.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 97 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 194 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2d |
Precise engine size | 2.14 L (2143 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 41 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 134 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0t |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | S 3.0t |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 204 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0t V6 |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 136 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 106 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
S 3.0 V6 |
3 L (2997 cc) |
27.7% bigger | 115 cc to 1 mpg | 135 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
2.2D |
2.14 L (2143 cc) |
8.7% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 134 cc to 100 kg |
S 3.5 V6 |
3.5 L (3498 cc) |
49.1% bigger | 100 cc to 1 mpg | 104 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | S 3.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 115 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 135 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2D |
Precise engine size | 2.14 L (2143 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 134 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | S 3.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 100 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 104 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |