Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0d |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.0p |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
3.0p |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 150 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0p |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0p |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 150 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |