Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Multijet |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 30 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 107 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Multijet |
1.96 L (1956 cc) |
16.6% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 130 cc to 100 kg |
1.4 MultiAir |
1.37 L (1368 cc) |
41.7% smaller | 40 cc to 1 mpg | 124 hp from 1 L | 91 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 Multijet |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 30 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 107 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Multijet |
Precise engine size | 1.96 L (1956 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 130 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 MultiAir |
Precise engine size | 1.37 L (1368 cc) |
Difference from world average | 41.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 40 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 124 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 91 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 81 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 CRD |
2.14 L (2143 cc) |
8.7% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 126 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 81 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 CRD |
Precise engine size | 2.14 L (2143 cc) |
Difference from world average | 8.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 126 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
2.36 L (2360 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 94 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CRD |
1.97 L (1968 cc) |
16.1% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2360 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 94 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRD |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1968 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |