Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 16V CRDi |
1.69 L (1685 cc) |
28.2% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
1.7 CRDI |
1.69 L (1685 cc) |
28.2% smaller | 34 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 16V GDI |
1.59 L (1591 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V GDI |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7 16V CRDi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.69 L (1685 cc) |
Difference from world average | 28.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7 CRDI |
Precise engine size | 1.69 L (1685 cc) |
Difference from world average | 28.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 34 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V GDI |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1591 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V GDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CRDi |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 124 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 124 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CRDi |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i 16V |
1.79 L (1793 cc) |
23.6% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1594 cc) |
32.1% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1793 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1594 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |